Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ancianita

(42,002 posts)

7. Okay. But those words aren't stated in the indictment. I hope the Smith team reiterate that to

Reply to pnwmom (Reply #4)

Fri Sep 1, 2023, 10:03 PM

Sep 2023

the jury.

I get what you mean. I might have misread, but those words aren't anywhere in the charging statements. If the prosecution states them as Trump's mens rea (sp?), then it will be in the court record. And likely considered by the jury.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Secretaries of State cannot decide if Trump is disqualified to be on their ballots until [View all] ancianita Sep 2023 OP

Every and any avenue should be pursued to keep his ass off the primary and general election ballots. magicarpet Sep 2023 #1

What about the suits to keep on ON the ballot. That's really the point of the issue. ancianita Sep 2023 #5

Not so, at least according to Judge Luttig and Lawrence Tribe. Ocelot II Sep 2023 #2

I read it (I subscribe). I saw their joint interview on MSNBC. I get it. ancianita Sep 2023 #6

THIS!!☝️its plain & simple wording. We all saw in real time & J6 hearing laid bare onetexan Sep 2023 #19

Blue states set a dangerous precedent if they remove him from the ballot. Runningdawg Sep 2023 #3

Red states need justifiable grounds to keep Biden off their ballots. magicarpet Sep 2023 #9

If Trump can be removed before conviction so can Biden. It doesn't matter if ANY of its legal. Runningdawg Sep 2023 #11

Refusing to send the National Guard in for hours was giving them aid. His tweets pnwmom Sep 2023 #4

Okay. But those words aren't stated in the indictment. I hope the Smith team reiterate that to ancianita Sep 2023 #7

Here are the points of the indictment I'm referring to, starting on page 41. pnwmom Sep 2023 #14

Only the 'love' tweet to insurrectionists is aid & comfort. The others are examples of ancianita Sep 2023 #15

The insurrectionists were there to stop Pence from certifying the election for Biden. pnwmom Sep 2023 #16

Okay. I'm convinced. I think that's key to the states' ballot issue. I don't think that without ancianita Sep 2023 #17

A lot is riding on Meadows removal request. So let's hope. nt pnwmom Sep 2023 #18

THIS!!☝️ onetexan Sep 2023 #20

The DC jury to which you refer is not really relevant rsdsharp Sep 2023 #8

I clearly meant the future petit jury. I'm aware that it's not the grand jury's decision. The grand ancianita Sep 2023 #10

I apologize for having misread the post. I thought you were saying the jury had ruled. rsdsharp Sep 2023 #12

Not a problem! ancianita Sep 2023 #13