General Discussion

James48

(5,016 posts)

7. It's a valid argument.

Reply to struggle4progress (Original post)

Fri Sep 1, 2023, 12:47 PM

Sep 2023

Federal preemption IS a valid argument to argue.

However, the actions taken are not duties if federal office. So there is that.

He may or may not get it moved to federal court.
The others who were NOT federal employees, don’t have a key to stand on, however.

We shall see how this pans out for Medows. Not likely, but possible it gets moved.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Meadows' goose is cooked [View all] struggle4progress Sep 2023 OP

Rich that bucolic_frolic Sep 2023 #1

What is this theory? "what controls is articulation of his federal defense" Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2023 #2

I will take a stab at unravelling that.. Alexander Of Assyria Sep 2023 #5

A well-established, codified into law, principle designed to keep state governments from going after onenote Sep 2023 #8

" please put a penny in the old man's hat..." rubbersole Sep 2023 #3

Maybe Cherokee100 Sep 2023 #4

Statement by University Law Prof. Anthony Michael Kreis IMO is right on. EOM Scottie Mom Sep 2023 #6

It's a valid argument. James48 Sep 2023 #7

A Thought On That ProfessorGAC Sep 2023 #11

AND let us NOT FORGET his good friend the SUPREME COURT JUSTICE'S Bluethroughu Sep 2023 #9

A very good point. EndlessWire Sep 2023 #10

Hopefully he and the other 18 will justice in the state court. republianmushroom Sep 2023 #12

K&R Blue Owl Sep 2023 #13

And he violated the Hatch Act in so doing. Captain Zero Sep 2023 #14