Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

joshcryer

(62,534 posts)
18. I advocate the free dissemination of data.
Fri Aug 18, 2023, 06:56 PM
Aug 2023

90% of coders (on Github) are currently using the AI tools to help them code more efficiently. The same will be true of writers and artists (Adobe's tools for example).

Here's the point you're missing. The gatekeepers still exist. The gatekeepers are those who own the intellectual property for a given thing. You can have all the power in the world to create Mickey Mouse with AI. Disney will sue the living crap out of you if you do it.

Anyway, like I said, you can make AIs that don't use this data and will work just as well. While image AIs are going to be more difficult to make work well with open data, it is not hard for those datasets to be built (in particular by people photographing / videoing real life), in which case the gatekeepers will say "you can't even take a real life picture." The arguments against using free data that is available on the internet becomes really weak from that perspective.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

well, i find this comforting. anyone else? mopinko Aug 2023 #1
Creative input is necessary and it only gives a short blurb. joshcryer Aug 2023 #3
yes. in the right hands, mopinko Aug 2023 #4
Generative AI is unethical. See reply 6. highplainsdem Aug 2023 #7
yeah, there's that. but again- in the right hands. mopinko Aug 2023 #11
Disney has the rights to those scripts, artwork, actors' voices, etc., ONLY highplainsdem Aug 2023 #16
i didnt say it was free. mopinko Aug 2023 #17
IMO it's unethical to use generative AI trained on data sets of stolen intellectual property, highplainsdem Aug 2023 #6
I think that will be difficult to enforce. joshcryer Aug 2023 #12
Not sure I understand your last line. You think ownership of intellectual property highplainsdem Aug 2023 #13
Yes. joshcryer Aug 2023 #14
What about all the individual artists, writers, musicians, coders et al. whose highplainsdem Aug 2023 #15
I advocate the free dissemination of data. joshcryer Aug 2023 #18
"You can have all the power MorbidButterflyTat Aug 2023 #20
I would hate to see a world where most writers and artists use AI for fake creativity highplainsdem Aug 2023 #21
+1 MorbidButterflyTat Aug 2023 #19
AI-written books are already creating lots of problems for real writers: highplainsdem Aug 2023 #5
'Dr. Miles Stones'? Maybe with a forward by Flash Point? 70sEraVet Aug 2023 #2
Nice catch - went over my head. yonder Aug 2023 #10
So AI is not I enough to fool Progressive dog Aug 2023 #8
If this example of AI germplasm gains a toehold, yonder Aug 2023 #9
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Nonfiction' Book About M...»Reply #18