Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

joshcryer

(62,534 posts)
12. I think that will be difficult to enforce.
Fri Aug 18, 2023, 02:15 PM
Aug 2023

And if the courts do find against those datasets there's still plenty of public domain stuff out there, with reenforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF), that you can still generate an LLM that is as useful. Open Assistant for instance is trained on public data such as Reddit posts and Wikipedia data, it does not contain any books or any intellectual property that isn't on a dataset that was openly available (a Reddit poster might say their posts are their own intellectual property though). Open Assistant I have found is vastly superior to ChatGPT and others when it comes to **writing process** because it has over 200,000 HLRF submissions in its dataset, people taking the time out of their day to write things for it. And because of that it has a writers touch. (On other tasks Open Assistant is poor though.)

I find intellectual property to itself be unethical, though.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

well, i find this comforting. anyone else? mopinko Aug 2023 #1
Creative input is necessary and it only gives a short blurb. joshcryer Aug 2023 #3
yes. in the right hands, mopinko Aug 2023 #4
Generative AI is unethical. See reply 6. highplainsdem Aug 2023 #7
yeah, there's that. but again- in the right hands. mopinko Aug 2023 #11
Disney has the rights to those scripts, artwork, actors' voices, etc., ONLY highplainsdem Aug 2023 #16
i didnt say it was free. mopinko Aug 2023 #17
IMO it's unethical to use generative AI trained on data sets of stolen intellectual property, highplainsdem Aug 2023 #6
I think that will be difficult to enforce. joshcryer Aug 2023 #12
Not sure I understand your last line. You think ownership of intellectual property highplainsdem Aug 2023 #13
Yes. joshcryer Aug 2023 #14
What about all the individual artists, writers, musicians, coders et al. whose highplainsdem Aug 2023 #15
I advocate the free dissemination of data. joshcryer Aug 2023 #18
"You can have all the power MorbidButterflyTat Aug 2023 #20
I would hate to see a world where most writers and artists use AI for fake creativity highplainsdem Aug 2023 #21
+1 MorbidButterflyTat Aug 2023 #19
AI-written books are already creating lots of problems for real writers: highplainsdem Aug 2023 #5
'Dr. Miles Stones'? Maybe with a forward by Flash Point? 70sEraVet Aug 2023 #2
Nice catch - went over my head. yonder Aug 2023 #10
So AI is not I enough to fool Progressive dog Aug 2023 #8
If this example of AI germplasm gains a toehold, yonder Aug 2023 #9
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Nonfiction' Book About M...»Reply #12