General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes tells U.S. Supreme Court to shove it [View all]wryter2000
(47,940 posts)Plus, in these two cases, there were no real plaintiffs.  No one had asked that woman to make a same sex wedding website for them.  No Asian students had sued Harvard because they weren't admitted.  There's supposed to be an active, real case involved to get a court at any level to intervene.  In the case of Roe, there had to be a special allowance made for the fact that a pregnant woman couldn't get relief before her baby was born.  Once the pregnancy had ended, so would the active case.
These decisions are abominations on many levels.  I hope anarchy isn't the result but just that Supreme Court decisions have no effect on what actually happens.  In other words, the ruling at the state level would stand and be enforced by local authorities.
As far as the marriage equality, I hope that woman is publicly shamed to the extent that it hurts her business.  That might act as a lesson to others who want to discriminate.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order): = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					