Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes tells U.S. Supreme Court to shove it [View all]
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes tells U.S. Supreme Court to shove itColorado has a law on the books that says, in simple terms, a business open to the public cant discriminate against gay people.
The radical right-wing majority of the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling last week saying that, yes, it can.
The court took the side of a web designer in Colorado who said it was her First Amendment right to refuse to design wedding websites for same-sex couples.
Arizona has a law much like Colorados.
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes announced in no uncertain terms that her office is determined to enforce it.
The Supreme Court be damned.
The radical right-wing majority of the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling last week saying that, yes, it can.
The court took the side of a web designer in Colorado who said it was her First Amendment right to refuse to design wedding websites for same-sex couples.
Arizona has a law much like Colorados.
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes announced in no uncertain terms that her office is determined to enforce it.
The Supreme Court be damned.
She will 'continue to enforce' Arizona's law
She said in her statement, Despite todays ruling, Arizona law prohibits discrimination in places of public accommodation, including discrimination because of sexual orientation and gender identity.
If any Arizonan believes that they have been the victim of discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), national origin, or ancestry in a place of public accommodation, they should file a complaint with my office. I will continue to enforce Arizonas public accommodation law to its fullest extent.
She said in her statement, Despite todays ruling, Arizona law prohibits discrimination in places of public accommodation, including discrimination because of sexual orientation and gender identity.
If any Arizonan believes that they have been the victim of discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), national origin, or ancestry in a place of public accommodation, they should file a complaint with my office. I will continue to enforce Arizonas public accommodation law to its fullest extent.
						
							83 replies
							
								 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
					
                    
					
                     = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
					
                    
					
                        Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes tells U.S. Supreme Court to shove it [View all]
							In It to Win It
							Jul 2023
							OP
                        
        
        Let the billionaires funding these supreme court decisions go broke taking EVERY
        BComplex
        Jul 2023
        #2
      
        
        If the discriminators have sanctions imposed on them for taking their crap suits to court,
        BComplex
        Jul 2023
        #5
      
        
        What's the discredited basis, though?  Lower courts are bound by the 303creative decision.
        JudyM
        Jul 2023
        #48
      
        
        I bet that most of the billionaires' expenditures cycles back into fat-cat pockets
        erronis
        Jul 2023
        #16
      
        
        I'm glad she has given notice to those who seek to practice their bigotry in the public sphere.
        Lonestarblue
        Jul 2023
        #6
      
        
        There are rumors that Thomas is considering retirement. I'll believe it when I see it, but
        PortTack
        Jul 2023
        #22
      
        
        It is so wonderful to be able to be proud of government actions in Arizona for a change!
        MLAA
        Jul 2023
        #7
      
        
        Me either!  I moved to Az right after college and have kept a home here though spent about 10
        MLAA
        Jul 2023
        #40
      
        
        Works for me!  I'm in Tucson, quite a bit smaller than Phoenix area, but even so it's grown
        MLAA
        Jul 2023
        #79
      
        
        Even if sex was not defined including sexual orientation and gender identity
        LiberalFighter
        Jul 2023
        #13
      
        
        Kudos to them..hope other states follow. The SC is supposedly all about states rights
        PortTack
        Jul 2023
        #15
      
        
        When the extreme court interprets the Constitution (which is what that case involved), states
        JudyM
        Jul 2023
        #49
      
        
        Individual states refusing to enforce Supreme Court decisions when the shoe is on the other foot
        Mr.Bill
        Jul 2023
        #37
      
        
        I agree with your point ripcord, it will happen that a GOP AG will ignore a SCOTUS ruling
        irisblue
        Jul 2023
        #82
      
        
        We are expected to obey the law, and they aren't, so this is an idea whose time has come
        bucolic_frolic
        Jul 2023
        #62
      
        
        Could allowing a protected people to sit at a bar be "expressive conduct"? thx in advance ...
        uponit7771
        Jul 2023
        #76
      
  