Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Hugh_Lebowski

(33,643 posts)
8. That's true in the sense ex-post-facto is constitutionally disallowed
Wed Jun 21, 2023, 02:11 AM
Jun 2023

But all the dude had to say was something like 'well, I'm not talking about marijuana here, I'm talking about dealing hard drugs, I should've clarified that when I made my earlier comments'

And he'd have been out of the pickle in 10 seconds.

But he couldn't even come up with THAT, and instead just flailed miserably.

At this rate, dude is going to be totally incoherent by the time the 2024 debates come around, and nobody will go to his rallies by because it's just too depressing, and too freaking boring.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This Bret Baier interview...»Reply #8