Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

agingdem

(8,670 posts)

10. we know and Jack Smith knows..

Reply to Marius25 (Reply #8)

Fri Jun 9, 2023, 12:01 PM

Jun 2023

if she does land the case (and so far she hasn't) and refuses to recuse then Smith goes to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals and asks for Cannon to be set aside because of her documented history of Trump impartiality...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WAPO article on judge assignment [View all] cilla4progress Jun 2023 OP

I'm hoping and betting that Jack Smith has it tied up so tight that even if she can't screw it up 🤞🏻 Walleye Jun 2023 #1

come on...this is Jack Smith and his team agingdem Jun 2023 #2

A lot of the criticism seems to be based around the idea AZSkiffyGeek Jun 2023 #3

No! This judge is a trump lackey GreenWave Jun 2023 #5

yes..because a guy who prosecutes war criminals agingdem Jun 2023 #6

Yup AZSkiffyGeek Jun 2023 #7

You guys aren't getting this. Marius25 Jun 2023 #8

we know and Jack Smith knows.. agingdem Jun 2023 #10

Wow, if it weren't real life it would be an implausibly bad joke. femmedem Jun 2023 #4

Cannon AGAIN!? Silent3 Jun 2023 #9