Get a load of this crap

[BumRushDaShow]

14. I for one

have ranted about the Security Council's "permanent members" configuration as a vestige of a world that no longer exists and that should be replaced with a different definition of "permanent members" that would represent each populated "geo-political continent" (necessarily excluding Antarctica and Australia, the latter only being a single country that could fall under "Asia" or be included in something named to incorporate the relevant Pacific islands with Asia).

I.e., have one "seat" each for ALL countries within "North America", South America", "Africa", "Europe", & "Asia" as your "5 permanent members". Those countries making up these groupings can rotate into/out of acting on behalf of that "permanent member" position for whatever timeframe is decided.