Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

bigtree

(92,842 posts)

14. you don't get to where you say the DOJ is likely to go without some kind of corruption

Reply to Eliot Rosewater (Reply #12)

Tue Mar 7, 2023, 10:09 PM

Mar 2023

...there is no defense against charging Trump that worries over politics or 'political opponents.'

If all you want is agreement with these suppositions, you shouldn't post them here.

Garland has done nothing to deserve this cynicism, and it's a circular argument to question if the prosecutions will work while supposing it won't matter in the end because Garland something, something. Give me a break.

You dish it out here, but seemed unprepared for pushback with actual facts.

And who the fuck is Dean Obeidellah?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump DOJ convicted more trump friends/officials than the past 2 yrs. [View all] Eliot Rosewater Mar 2023 OP

Agree - it is very frustrating. Doesn't lend a lot of confidence to our justice system. walkingman Mar 2023 #1

Too bad none of them are in prisonnow kimbutgar Mar 2023 #2

It's almost as if someone is WAY overdoing the effort to not APPEAR to be political n/t Silent3 Mar 2023 #3

But think about it for a minute, arresting your political opponent... Eliot Rosewater Mar 2023 #4

This was too important to worry more about appearances that the need for speed Silent3 Mar 2023 #13

+1, uponit7771 Mar 2023 #16

+1, Garland is 100% political he's not partisan. In this case he should be looking at the facts uponit7771 Mar 2023 #15

If anything, it proves that DOJ has always been a non-partisan organization. Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #5

this is a circular argument concluding the DOJ won't act against Trump bigtree Mar 2023 #6

Saying time doesn't matter scares me. gab13by13 Mar 2023 #9

try replying to something I actually said bigtree Mar 2023 #10

Where in the HELL did I defame Garland or accuse him of anything? Eliot Rosewater Mar 2023 #12

you don't get to where you say the DOJ is likely to go without some kind of corruption bigtree Mar 2023 #14

Eliot, I have some more; gab13by13 Mar 2023 #7

How many on that list were Mr.Bill Mar 2023 #8

All before that vile traitor took over I think...or they were started before he came Eliot Rosewater Mar 2023 #11