...with absolutely nothing supporting that supposition except your own cynicism, and whoever elses that gloms onto this.
There is a more concrete weight of evidence that DOJ is well on the way to establishing the intent required to charge Trump, with top administration figures presently before dual grand juries.
Why would the prosecution be 'running out of time' in Ga. with an unsigned law which calls for a committee that's yet to be formed, and absolutely no one having come forth declaring their intention to indict Fani Willis before the yet non-existent committee, absent of any legal challenges to this interference in the judiciary by the state legislature, and none of that likely to happen until at least the end of the year, if at all?
Both the DOJ grand juries are still functioning without a decision yet, as is the Ga. grand jury just seated in March for a two-month term and no-doubt already hearing evidence.
Enough with the nonfactual timetables lighting hair on fire. No one should be riding on anyone's angst that assumes the DOJ is either corrupt, compromised or hapless. There is no political timetable, just the deliberations; perp and witness challenges; as well as grand jury arrangements and court schedules set by judges .
It's little more than imaginings to posit this disbelief against the justice being pursued right in front of us. You need more than a knowing nod to the past to make it credible because, grand juries are still in deliberation and no decision has come out of any of them.
Interesting, though, how you twist this notion of patriotism and fairness into a defense of criminality. You can't get to where you so blithely suggest Garland stands without some inherent corruption in, not only himself, but in his office. It requires a higher burden of proof than your innuendo to put any truth to this casual defamation.
= new reply since forum marked as read