Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Effete Snob

(8,387 posts)
4. I'm not wasting a quarter of an hour to watch some guy rant
Thu Mar 2, 2023, 10:45 AM
Mar 2023

But the assumption that videotapes of places where no defendant was located is somehow either exculpatory or will impeach a government witness is far-fetched.

People don't run YouTube channels as a public service. The more eyeballs they can capture, the more money they make.

So, the challenge of being a YouTuber is to make sure that your videos have enough controversial material - or as this Popok character puts it in his tweets:



It got only eight recs, and it got lost, possibly being seen as less important than "cats."


I don't know how other folks read DU, but I glance at it in between doing other things while working to, you know, READ stuff. Reading is tremendously more efficient than watching videos, so posts of the "hey, here's a video that someone makes money to publish and will take 12 minutes to watch" variety aren't as interesting as simply saying "I believe the DoJ has failed to turn over Brady evidence in some J6 case, because a surveillance video of some place nowhere near the defendant is exculpatory somehow."

It's a stupid take, but, sure, it gets eyeballs.

And it's a stupid take because those videos exist whether McCarthy turns them over to Tucker or not. Those videos either have, or have not, been in the possession of the DoJ from the outset (which, again, I'm not watching 12 minutes of some guy bloviating in order to find out if he even bothers with that basic question), and the DoJ has either turned them over to the defense or has determined there is nothing exculpatory or impeachment-worthy in them.

The basic premise - that McCarthy giving them to Tucker creates a Brady problem - is fundamentally bullshit in the first place. The security videos from the Capitol either do or do not contain Brady material. But McCarthy's antics do not alter whether they do or do not contain Brady material.

So, another disincentive to waste my time watching yet another youtube video is the apparent and obvious fact that the videos have existed since Jan. 6, they either do or do not contain Brady material, they have or have not been turned over to the various defense teams in relevant part (which this guy would also not even know), and McCarthy's actions change NONE of that.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sorry I'm very hard of hearing. I can't get what most videos are saying. Biophilic Mar 2023 #1
"Brady" evidence is any evidence in the hands of the prosecution Ocelot II Mar 2023 #3
...or which might impeach the credibility of a witness Effete Snob Mar 2023 #6
Thank you. Biophilic Mar 2023 #9
I doubt very much that's the reason. The defendants already got all their Brady evidence Ocelot II Mar 2023 #2
Once again your version is shorter and more to the point than mine below. Effete Snob Mar 2023 #5
Thank you, but you performed a valuable service by explaining Ocelot II Mar 2023 #7
Well you are making me feel a little better, BUT given the stacked courts I can believe they will... usaf-vet Mar 2023 #10
Slow Down NowISeetheLight Mar 2023 #17
I'm not wasting a quarter of an hour to watch some guy rant Effete Snob Mar 2023 #4
Yup. Ocelot II Mar 2023 #8
It seems DU has been getting inundated with this kind of thing, picking up the last few months or so Chakaconcarne Mar 2023 #11
I too almost always would rather read than watch Silent3 Mar 2023 #13
Reading is a wonderful way to get information. Until you are in your seventies with the onset.... usaf-vet Mar 2023 #14
Absolutely, people have different information preferences Effete Snob Mar 2023 #15
You have a point, of course; but it would be nice if more of these videos Ocelot II Mar 2023 #18
Totally agree. usaf-vet Mar 2023 #21
"We are a long way off from indictments turning into trials turning into prison sentences" Silent3 Mar 2023 #12
I agree, but have a couple points. FoxNewsSucks Mar 2023 #16
Cat videos are normally posted in the Lounge, where they belong, and can be ignored Ocelot II Mar 2023 #19
I'm not knocking any animal videos, including cats. FoxNewsSucks Mar 2023 #20
So says the ocelot, lol Effete Snob Mar 2023 #24
Well, yeah. My people. Ocelot II Mar 2023 #25
Agreed, agreed, agreed! I would also love a summary. I have pets but would never post there..... usaf-vet Mar 2023 #22
I have a squirrel that visits every day for walnuts Effete Snob Mar 2023 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There have been several t...»Reply #4