Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: There have been several threads over the last few days saying GOP or Trump or MTG had bad days [View all]Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)4. I'm not wasting a quarter of an hour to watch some guy rant
But the assumption that videotapes of places where no defendant was located is somehow either exculpatory or will impeach a government witness is far-fetched.
People don't run YouTube channels as a public service. The more eyeballs they can capture, the more money they make.
So, the challenge of being a YouTuber is to make sure that your videos have enough controversial material - or as this Popok character puts it in his tweets:
It got only eight recs, and it got lost, possibly being seen as less important than "cats."
I don't know how other folks read DU, but I glance at it in between doing other things while working to, you know, READ stuff. Reading is tremendously more efficient than watching videos, so posts of the "hey, here's a video that someone makes money to publish and will take 12 minutes to watch" variety aren't as interesting as simply saying "I believe the DoJ has failed to turn over Brady evidence in some J6 case, because a surveillance video of some place nowhere near the defendant is exculpatory somehow."
It's a stupid take, but, sure, it gets eyeballs.
And it's a stupid take because those videos exist whether McCarthy turns them over to Tucker or not. Those videos either have, or have not, been in the possession of the DoJ from the outset (which, again, I'm not watching 12 minutes of some guy bloviating in order to find out if he even bothers with that basic question), and the DoJ has either turned them over to the defense or has determined there is nothing exculpatory or impeachment-worthy in them.
The basic premise - that McCarthy giving them to Tucker creates a Brady problem - is fundamentally bullshit in the first place. The security videos from the Capitol either do or do not contain Brady material. But McCarthy's antics do not alter whether they do or do not contain Brady material.
So, another disincentive to waste my time watching yet another youtube video is the apparent and obvious fact that the videos have existed since Jan. 6, they either do or do not contain Brady material, they have or have not been turned over to the various defense teams in relevant part (which this guy would also not even know), and McCarthy's actions change NONE of that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
25 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

There have been several threads over the last few days saying GOP or Trump or MTG had bad days [View all]
usaf-vet
Mar 2023
OP
I doubt very much that's the reason. The defendants already got all their Brady evidence
Ocelot II
Mar 2023
#2
Well you are making me feel a little better, BUT given the stacked courts I can believe they will...
usaf-vet
Mar 2023
#10
It seems DU has been getting inundated with this kind of thing, picking up the last few months or so
Chakaconcarne
Mar 2023
#11
Reading is a wonderful way to get information. Until you are in your seventies with the onset....
usaf-vet
Mar 2023
#14
"We are a long way off from indictments turning into trials turning into prison sentences"
Silent3
Mar 2023
#12
Cat videos are normally posted in the Lounge, where they belong, and can be ignored
Ocelot II
Mar 2023
#19