General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: My confidence that Merrick Garland will do the right thing is virtually zero [View all]Justice matters.
(9,047 posts)If ever, because by any bad luck (but more by no swift action on Obstruction of Justice crimeS), a sudden crisis, or another 'October Surprise,' hair furhair manages to be elected (if he's not eating steaks in a State prison, and even then...). Or any other semi-fascist successor does it, kiss goodbye to all the ongoing costly investigations.
Garland let the Statute of Limitations on the SDNY "Individual 1" ?case expire on his watch.
Garland let the Statute of Limitations on the last occurrences of Obstruction of Justice detailed in the Mueller Report (by the way, where is that un-redacted version?? Up in fumes in a fireplace??) expire on his watch.
Garland kept the Barr decision of representing hair furhair in the E. Jean Carroll defamation case, arguing that it is a sitting President's duty to insult a woman who accuses him of RAPE... (the kitty grabber... duh...) paid by your tax dollars and cents, thank you very much!!
No. Based on all these facts, Garland will not indict the lifelong, abject imbecile criminal because the Federal investigations won't be done before perhaps a decade (on purpose) due to the decision to include examining the implications of thousands of classified pages (their contents and which "entity" they might impact), instead of starting with the Obstruction of Justice case (admissions both on Lies Social and on YouTube videos; re: "they're mine and I will NEVAH return them"...) and adding supplemental charges as they will be ready (ten years after?).
Georgia and NY will probably bring charges, but expect endless appeals...