NYTimes editorial about the growing 'Urban-rural "apartheid" '

[Hortensis]

10. Worth reading, sure, but what's with using the loaded word "apartheid"

so inappropriately? Did they put it in the headline for clickbait and have it edited out?

We all know what apartheid is. And we know that all those awful urban Jews and blacks, and of course snooty white libs, aren't displacing poor Ozzie and Harriet to segregation in distant wastelands. They not only have the vote, but on on average they actually count more than those of urban dwellers, -- to "resentful" rural conservatives all part of being proudly deserving Americans versus those who aren't either.