Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

FBaggins

(28,452 posts)

12. That's what they're doing

Reply to Buckeyeblue (Reply #4)

Tue Nov 29, 2022, 12:25 PM

Nov 2022

Whitehouse knew that it wouldn't go any farther than what is implied in the court's response.

If this were a criminal proceeding, what they're doing is essentially an "offer of proof"... and it wouldn't go any farther because it's essentially triple (quadruple?) hearsay.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NEW: Sen. Whitehouse and Rep. Johnson respond to yesterday's Supreme Court counsel's letter defendi [View all] In It to Win It Nov 2022 OP

Get thee to the greatest page malaise Nov 2022 #1

SCOTUS 5 acknowledge no law that disagrees with their Christofascism. lark Nov 2022 #2

SCROTUS MayReasonRule Nov 2022 #20

I love this. Kick it. But to what benefit? Ninga Nov 2022 #3

See post 4 below yours. emulatorloo Nov 2022 #5

Sadly the best course of action is to call them out publicly Buckeyeblue Nov 2022 #4

That's what they're doing FBaggins Nov 2022 #12

It's very late in the 117th Congress to start an investigation soldierant Nov 2022 #38

A criminal investigation and trial would take years with all of the appeals Buckeyeblue Nov 2022 #41

I'm reminded of an old story about a person who had soldierant Nov 2022 #44

We do not have a Supreme Court; we have an Extreme Court. Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2022 #6

Or is it MurrayDelph Nov 2022 #16

Google "Sheldon Whitehouse scheme speeches" CrispyQ Nov 2022 #7

Thanks for the link. Whitehouse is amazing. emulatorloo Nov 2022 #8

He's not in the least amazing! skamaria Nov 2022 #19

You are confused dpibel Nov 2022 #21

Visualize egg on my face! skamaria Nov 2022 #31

You have him confused with someone else. CrispyQ Nov 2022 #30

Mea Culpa! skamaria Nov 2022 #32

"Sleeping sentries". DAYUM. calimary Nov 2022 #25

K&R UTUSN Nov 2022 #9

That Is Blistering DallasNE Nov 2022 #10

Another flaw in Founding Fathers' logic Marthe48 Nov 2022 #11

Exactly this. JudyM Nov 2022 #35

So True Haru Nov 2022 #13

THIS! No more lifetime appointments!!! calimary Nov 2022 #26

It would require a Constitutional Amendment, so no chance. Celerity Nov 2022 #39

Whitehouse is excellent. momta Nov 2022 #14

A lot depends on what committees they're on. ShazzieB Nov 2022 #33

K&R K& R K&R K&R K& R K&R K&R K& R K&R TigressDem Nov 2022 #15

I'd rec 1000 times if I could. Thank you, Sen Whitehouse & Rep Johnson. nt crickets Nov 2022 #17

Hell, don't expect any truthful answers from the supreme court. Then you will not be disappointed. republianmushroom Nov 2022 #18

They are running a very crucial playbook. TygrBright Nov 2022 #22

They're trying to prepare new ground gratuitous Nov 2022 #23

What else happened in the last 25 years? Oh yeah Fox News. Initech Nov 2022 #24

"Procedure is the bone structure of justice" Bucky Nov 2022 #27

Off topic, can SOMEONE with a legal mind explain the Raland Brunson case?? oldsoftie Nov 2022 #28

knr 💯👍☎⁉ msfiddlestix Nov 2022 #29

The response from the counsel for the SCOTUS was a non-response response LetMyPeopleVote Nov 2022 #34

Nemo Judex In Sua Causa Blue Owl Nov 2022 #36

McConnell: I can't believe it took them this long to figure this out... NullTuples Nov 2022 #37

What is this Rep. Johnson's first name? Is this Ron Johnson? raging moderate Nov 2022 #40

Hank Johnson of Georgia In It to Win It Nov 2022 #42

Oh, thank you! Hank Johnson! raging moderate Nov 2022 #43