Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

msfiddlestix

(8,140 posts)

5. Thank you

Reply to mahatmakanejeeves (Reply #3)

Wed Nov 9, 2022, 09:42 AM

Nov 2022

Sort of what the term "whistleblower" is commonly used. But officially of course in legal docs, it's CHS.

On the other hand, an informant suffices for the public.

Well, is this a bad thing? Something the public would learn eventually, just untimely?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

OOPS: DOJ appears to have inadvertently posted a sealed filing asking Judge Mehta to grill ... [View all] mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2022 OP

What is a CHS? msfiddlestix Nov 2022 #1

a confidential human source Native Nov 2022 #2

✔️ Ty n/t msfiddlestix Nov 2022 #7

I didn't know either. I had to look it up. mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2022 #3

Thank you msfiddlestix Nov 2022 #5

According to the thread, CHS is "Confidential human source". nt PunkinPi Nov 2022 #4

✔️ Ty n/t msfiddlestix Nov 2022 #6

Maybe. DOJ isn't staffed by a pack of third tier lawyers/para legal. CincyDem Nov 2022 #8

I doubt that was inadvertent. DarthDem Nov 2022 #9