General Discussion

plimsoll

(1,690 posts)

9. Those guys will be "grandfathered" in.

Tue Nov 1, 2022, 11:52 AM

Nov 2022

So well have Amy, Neil, Bret, Sam and John for a long, long time. Sure Clarence will probably pop his clogs sooner, but we're talking decades of this headlock on the court. That was the point of their nominations, young ideologues. This court is broken, and while you're right that it becomes a tit for tat game let's not pretend that it wasn't a well thought out strategy to create a corrupt court.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

66 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Holy Fuck! Has there ever been a time in American history where so many cases that pertained [View all] Baitball Blogger Nov 2022 OP

K&R. William769 Nov 2022 #1

No shit TheRealNorth Nov 2022 #2

Or his taxes.As Whitehouse says. " SCOTUS is captured". Pepsidog Nov 2022 #22

As Michael Corleone told his lawyer BOSSHOG Nov 2022 #3

We are seeing in real time how to end democracy and install an autocracy. Irish_Dem Nov 2022 #15

It's the Court of the GOP now folks. plimsoll Nov 2022 #4

A better and more doable strategy would be SCOTUS term limits. calimary Nov 2022 #7

Those guys will be "grandfathered" in. plimsoll Nov 2022 #9

Yeah in 2016 I thought we would be sitting pretty with SCOTUS for the rest of my life. Pepsidog Nov 2022 #24

It's no secret; GOP leaders like McConnell have openly gloated about how proud they are of it. NullTuples Nov 2022 #55

With the current partisan hacks installed for DECADES to come, its game over. Moostache Nov 2022 #11

Truly an untenable situation that must be corrected. Pepsidog Nov 2022 #25

IANAL, but couldn't expansion be linked to the number of circuit courts? BadgerMom Nov 2022 #19

I agree, 13 justices with term limits, and written ethics rules. gab13by13 Nov 2022 #34

Term limits requires an amendment Zeitghost Nov 2022 #46

SCROTUS MayReasonRule Nov 2022 #45

The fundie nutjobs got what they wanted - SCOTUS. Initech Nov 2022 #5

I will not live peaceably in a theocratic fascist dictatorship. Moostache Nov 2022 #12

I don't worry about a religious fascist country DENVERPOPS Nov 2022 #42

I worry about it Genki Hikari Nov 2022 #47

Maybe I am wrong DENVERPOPS Nov 2022 #63

BOTH are worrisome as hell. Ferrets are Cool Nov 2022 #51

The Nixon Administration? BlueIdaho Nov 2022 #6

It's a case that started in 2019 Sympthsical Nov 2022 #8

Don't do that...please. Moostache Nov 2022 #13

Kagan and Sotomayor also issued similar stays recently Sympthsical Nov 2022 #14

It goes to the core constitution of the court, Moostache Nov 2022 #16

Non-sequitur Sympthsical Nov 2022 #30

Also a common administrative procedure gab13by13 Nov 2022 #37

They may feel there are issues involved that require at least a cursory glance Sympthsical Nov 2022 #48

But they haven't decided yet whether to hear the appeal. sl8 Nov 2022 #53

The USSC destroyed their legitimacy of the court DENVERPOPS Nov 2022 #43

Oh look, it's both siderism. Thanks for playing. 58Sunliner Nov 2022 #23

So do you agree or disagree with Kagan's granting a stay of the J6 Committee subpoena to Kelli Ward? onenote Nov 2022 #26

It's closer to no-siderism Sympthsical Nov 2022 #31

"Are they also right-wing? Why/why not? Are they in on it? How deep does it all go?!" 58Sunliner Nov 2022 #32

are you unwilling to acknowledge the SC has been completely corrupted? Skittles Nov 2022 #56

I think Thomas is a general mess Sympthsical Nov 2022 #57

last week? Skittles Nov 2022 #58

So you're not going to answer the question Sympthsical Nov 2022 #61

honestly Skittles Nov 2022 #66

Well said. At the very least,the last 3 appointments should be impeached for lies when we have the Pepsidog Nov 2022 #27

Whatever happened to DENVERPOPS Nov 2022 #33

I'm with you, although some say they will do it too. Get rid of the filibuster, expand USSC, protect Pepsidog Nov 2022 #36

Great ideas DENVERPOPS Nov 2022 #39

Honest toGod.. I was just signing in to ask the same quiestion Peacetrain Nov 2022 #10

Not to mention all to sidestep prosecution for crimes. SheltieLover Nov 2022 #17

Rec this whole thread.. n/t Paper Roses Nov 2022 #18

Nope. The heavy use of junk litigation and due process stalls are attempted end runs around ancianita Nov 2022 #20

As an attorney I have always managed to get expedited hearings on cases that were time sensitive and Pepsidog Nov 2022 #28

Good for you. Maybe at the court levels of your practice, perhaps the deck isn't stacked. Dunno. ancianita Nov 2022 #35

Well said Evolve Dammit Nov 2022 #29

The GOP clogging up the courts sarcasmo Nov 2022 #21

The Reich Wing has been waiting 40 years for this Court majority. RedSpartan Nov 2022 #38

They definitely DENVERPOPS Nov 2022 #44

I recall nothing like it. TomSlick Nov 2022 #40

This has been their plan for decades Quanto Magnus Nov 2022 #41

Lots of horrors and complaining yet PlutosHeart Nov 2022 #49

Way Late inthewind21 Nov 2022 #65

I've been comtemplating this exact thing. The court is the one who should be shutting it down Ferrets are Cool Nov 2022 #50

The GQP fall back position The Wizard Nov 2022 #52

Peas!!! dcmfox Nov 2022 #54

The vast majority of appeals are ignored by SCOTUS, but not anything filed by MF45 or his henchmen. SunSeeker Nov 2022 #59

+1 Baitball Blogger Nov 2022 #62

STACK THE COURTS Heather MC Nov 2022 #60

Sometimes, the stink of toxic corruption can be overwhelming. Torchlight Nov 2022 #64