Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

getagrip_already

(17,782 posts)

5. I wasn't on the call, but you can get a partial description here...

Reply to intrepidity (Reply #4)

Tue Sep 20, 2022, 04:29 PM

Sep 2022

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1572289852376334337

The process part, as near as I can tell, focussed on what the judge could do given that tfg wasn't claiming he declassified the docs.

He said he (and I'm wicked bad paraphrasing here) was inclined to accept as fact that the documents were classified. He also said he hoped he could rule without actually looking at the classified docs, and that he was leaning to tfg's lwyers not having a need to know what was in them.

Process stuff.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Re tfg's sharpie doodles on "classified" docs [View all] intrepidity Sep 2022 OP

deerie can figure that out - that's what he is there for....... getagrip_already Sep 2022 #1

So, what was the point of today's hearing? nt intrepidity Sep 2022 #2

to establish the schedule and process to conduct the review... n/t getagrip_already Sep 2022 #3

Tell me more about the "process" part, please. nt intrepidity Sep 2022 #4

I wasn't on the call, but you can get a partial description here... getagrip_already Sep 2022 #5

OK, thanks for the summation intrepidity Sep 2022 #6

Some light reading from the Department of State... ultralite001 Sep 2022 #7