Re tfg's sharpie doodles on "classified" docs

[intrepidity]

Can tfg claim that any docs with his sharpie scribbles on them are subject to review by his team? IOW, since DOJ wants to keep ALL (or at least, about 100) of these most highly sensitive docs away from tfg's team's eyes, could those markings render them sufficiently in dispute that his team *must* view them in order to be able to make any claims about them, eg, relative to whether tfg supposedly declassified them, or if they somehow became "personal records."

I'm speaking in the context of the issue before Dearie, which is civil, not criminal.

I wouldn't be surprised if the tfg had been counseled at some point in the past to make these markings for just such a purpose--to confound things in the event they came under scrutiny.