Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

viguy007

(125 posts)
10. I believe all domestic partnerships should have equal rights
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 01:18 PM
Nov 2012

But a domestic partnership between a man and a woman is the relationship which a state can define as a marriage. It is only a word, why fight over it. It is a subset of the set "domestic partnership'. The greater set "domestic partnerships" has equal legal, economic, and social rights for all.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R Jamastiene Nov 2012 #1
K&R Solly Mack Nov 2012 #2
To think the Republicans RAN on being anti-gay in 04. Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2012 #3
Oddly, many people on the "left" seem deeply invested in the idea that our culture is getting worse. Warren DeMontague Nov 2012 #23
What, are you kidding? Even during the Bush Years we could see the transformation.... Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2012 #25
Oh, its been on an improving trajectory. Warren DeMontague Nov 2012 #27
Republicans couldn't survive if everybody was informed and voted. Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2012 #28
Post removed Post removed Nov 2012 #4
Same-sex marriage is not a "foreign value forced on others", it is a matter of EQUALITY. Behind the Aegis Nov 2012 #5
I believe all domestic partnerships should have equal rights viguy007 Nov 2012 #10
It's only a word, why fight over it?! Behind the Aegis Nov 2012 #12
"It is only a word, why fight over it". Seriously you have to ask? William769 Nov 2012 #16
Equal protection under the law has FieryLocks Nov 2012 #17
It's not just a word EvolveOrConvolve Nov 2012 #18
I see it closely paralleling religious freedom. reusrename Nov 2012 #29
So all that time mythology Nov 2012 #22
If a more local level is better, how about the most local level of all- the individual? Warren DeMontague Nov 2012 #6
We disagree over the use of a word viguy007 Nov 2012 #11
Why deny the gay couple down the street the right to use the civic word "marriage" just b/c it bugs Warren DeMontague Nov 2012 #14
Indeed, why argue over the use of a word when the solution is simple. Equal rights. And regarding uppityperson Nov 2012 #20
Why should the state legislate a difference without distinction? Its marriage for everyone. marble falls Aug 2019 #32
The most local is the indiviual. Vanje Nov 2012 #24
The irony here is that the only Federal efforts are to ban same sex marriage hootinholler Nov 2012 #26
I'd like to inject a bit of history into the marriage equality issue justiceischeap Nov 2012 #7
Shared for my daughter, for my friends, for those I don't know, for us all. wellstone dem Nov 2012 #8
Good luck Wellstone Dem! WillParkinson Nov 2012 #9
I'm for getting rid of the term "marriage" and make them all "domestic partnerships" cherish44 Nov 2012 #13
Y'know what, though? yoyossarian Nov 2012 #15
+1 n/t ChazII Nov 2012 #19
That is not going to happen. "Marriage" as a civic and legal intitution is well established. Warren DeMontague Nov 2012 #21
Thank you! WillParkinson Nov 2012 #30
Man, we have come a long way. DonRedwood Nov 2012 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I am your reason to suppo...»Reply #10