Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: raise your hand if you support protesting kavenaugh and his SC buddies everywhere they go [View all]jho
(4 posts)75. I agree, No Justice No Peace
Yes, I raise my hand and support protesting kavenaugh and his SC buddies everywhere they go.
This also includes barrett,thomas,alito,gorsuch and roberts.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
180 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

raise your hand if you support protesting kavenaugh and his SC buddies everywhere they go [View all]
moonshinegnomie
Jul 2022
OP
I always think it is odd that even though this amendment specifically says NO LAW...ABRIDGING
LT Barclay
Jul 2022
#29
The first says "Congress shall make no law" - laws regulating speech and press were meant to be left
PoliticAverse
Jul 2022
#51
I don't read either that way. Congress established laws creating states. So if congress allowed
LT Barclay
Jul 2022
#56
Congress didn't "allow states to regulate speech". The states created Congress...
PoliticAverse
Jul 2022
#59
by that logic, states could do anything to regulate speech. They could seize books,
LT Barclay
Jul 2022
#71
Well what a mess! But at least we're heading in the right direction. At this rate we'll have a
LT Barclay
Jul 2022
#179
You need to look up the phrase "well-regulated" and use sources from the time the phrase was used...
PoliticAverse
Jul 2022
#89
A militia that functions effectively, that is a well trained one and equipped one. n/t
PoliticAverse
Jul 2022
#92
So, you're saying the "militia" referred to in the 2nd is in proper working order,
Higherarky
Jul 2022
#102
No. Lots of things hoped for by the writers of the Constitution aren't working as expected. n/t
PoliticAverse
Jul 2022
#103
That's adopting Scalia's view hook, line, and sinker. Have you forgotten John Paul Stevens' dissent?
MerryHolidays
Jul 2022
#161
Actually no, the Supreme Court has allowed restrictions on anti-abortion protests...
PoliticAverse
Jul 2022
#53
No, you shouldn't "follow every recourse available", but only recourses that are effective...
PoliticAverse
Jul 2022
#61
If you're going to screw the people, don't expect to walk peaceably among them.
Gidney N Cloyd
Jul 2022
#14
"These people" protesting for the right of women to control their own bodies are not as
Scrivener7
Jul 2022
#18
Lol. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt. Maybe it's not that people here "aren't real
Scrivener7
Jul 2022
#97
So you DO support this protest of Kavanaugh. Because it, too, has substantive
Scrivener7
Jul 2022
#130
When someone claims that all protest is legitimate, you should tell them that.
Scrivener7
Jul 2022
#164
And after all, we're all on tenterhooks to know if it gains your endorsement.
Scrivener7
Jul 2022
#175
So? Is that what you'd tell MLK? He'd tell you back: there are just laws, and there are unjust laws
ancianita
Jul 2022
#27
There will be other cases that come up. They could perform their usual logical gymnastics and rule
LT Barclay
Jul 2022
#33
So don't protest because you don't want to upset them? This is what you're saying?
Scrivener7
Jul 2022
#98
Didn't Thomas say something like; I'm going to spend the next 43 years making Liberal lives
panader0
Jul 2022
#22
Yup! And for that, he can go eat the steamiest bag of rancid dog shit imaginable!
Initech
Jul 2022
#26
Why don't wealthy Dems out PI's on R SCOTUS members like the Rs did to get rid of
Pepsidog
Jul 2022
#49
Just as they have made millions of lives miserable so should their families pay the price. The
Pepsidog
Jul 2022
#39
The next time they protest at a restaurant etc. they need to cover the back door too.
appleannie1
Jul 2022
#55
si. now he knows what it is like to face a line of protesters and has to retreat via
AllaN01Bear
Jul 2022
#58
Nope, it's dumb and creates sympathy for Kavanaugh and other such little fellers
gulliver
Jul 2022
#62
You don't think protest works, then? And what does this have to do with hatred?
Scrivener7
Jul 2022
#114
All of which boils back down to "don't upset people." And I still disagree.
Scrivener7
Jul 2022
#165
Hey, they impacted the lives of so many of us in so many ways, why shouldn't they too, suffer
SWBTATTReg
Jul 2022
#87
Do NOT protest! Shower him with never-ending praise, prayers, preaching, and hymns.
keithbvadu2
Jul 2022
#141
Six yrs ago I suggested anytime trump or ANY maga or ANY repub go outdoors
Eliot Rosewater
Jul 2022
#143
Alito is the one. I keep hearing Kavenaugh but not Alito. He is the one who
patricia92243
Jul 2022
#158
how about take all that energy and help pregnant women get to a sane state when they need a ride
eShirl
Jul 2022
#159
No food, no gasoline for these people. They are not in the Constitution. /nt
bucolic_frolic
Jul 2022
#162
They deliberately and intentionally lied under oath and screwed half the country.
Initech
Jul 2022
#178