Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Jerry2144

(3,287 posts)

3. Those are not crimes

Reply to Liberty Belle (Reply #2)

Thu Jun 30, 2022, 07:45 PM

Jun 2022

But if Ginny is convicted of something like that, he can possibly be tripped as an accomplice

We can’t impeach just braise of conflict of interest. Then it would be made out to be political and not justified by the right. And they would do the same to ours. There must be clear crimes down.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Can we set a new precedent and impeach a sitting SCOTUS Justice? [View all] Samrob Jun 2022 OP

Sure just as soon as you come up with impeachable acts and the votes to impeach/convict. Thomas Hurt Jun 2022 #1

Thomas for sure - clear conflict of interest with his insurrectionist wife's activities. Liberty Belle Jun 2022 #2

Those are not crimes Jerry2144 Jun 2022 #3

Not until we have 67 Senators who MineralMan Jun 2022 #4

Sitting justices have faced impeachment before Amishman Jun 2022 #5

Wouldn't be a "new precedent" as SCJ Samuel Case was impeached in 1804. Just A Box Of Rain Jun 2022 #6

Impeachment would mean a not guilty verdict Locutusofborg Jun 2022 #7

Why settle for one??? ultralite001 Jun 2022 #8