Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

former9thward

(33,424 posts)

4. The court's opinion does not follow the headline.

Reply to Eugene (Original post)

Fri Apr 15, 2022, 01:34 AM

Apr 2022

His claims were not exactly "shredded". The court said the statements were defamatory but Nunes did not follow the procedures in CA law for filing such a case. It is a very technical decision.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Second Circuit shreds Nunes defamation claims against CNN [View all] Eugene Apr 2022 OP

that's just MOOvelous! NewHendoLib Apr 2022 #1

I udderly agree! nt abqtommy Apr 2022 #5

K&R UTUSN Apr 2022 #2

You can't defame someone who is infamous. J_William_Ryan Apr 2022 #3

The court's opinion does not follow the headline. former9thward Apr 2022 #4