Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mike Nelson

(10,764 posts)
6. Agree...
Sun Apr 10, 2022, 09:34 PM
Apr 2022

... she must mean they are looking at timing... I'm sure they agree he's a crook and his criminal activities are known. But there must be some discussion about how/when to hold him accountable. They need to think about how to proceed... referring now would mean what? The referral sits there and nothing happens through the midterm elections? Then, he campaigns on the matter being just another "witch hunt" that went nowhere? Republicans win and the Committee disbanded? I'd rather see the hearings heat up in the summer... with live witnesses... and fall indictments.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If they have the evidence, it should be referred tomorrow and the Committee Hoyt Apr 2022 #1
Right wing rag. onecaliberal Apr 2022 #2
+100 I'm with you! nt abqtommy Apr 2022 #3
Enemies of Democracy. Cha Apr 2022 #4
That, they are. onecaliberal Apr 2022 #5
Agree... Mike Nelson Apr 2022 #6
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Cheney rejects report of ...»Reply #6