Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

keep_left

(3,075 posts)

6. Their editorial page has been a joke since the neocon days of Paul Gigot et al.

Reply to turbinetree (Original post)

Sat Mar 26, 2022, 08:15 PM

Mar 2022

I remember how easy it was to predict what their take would be on any issue...just constant knee-jerk responses. At some point, Murdoch must have decided their takes just weren't spicy enough for the alt-righters and started hiring editorial page writers more suitable for far-right radtrad publications like Crisis and First Things.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Wall Street Journal pushes conspiracy theory to defend Ginni Thomas [View all] turbinetree Mar 2022 OP

The Wall Street Journal is also known as The Wall Street Urinal. nt abqtommy Mar 2022 #1

Their editorial pages are unfit to line a bird cage dalton99a Mar 2022 #2

WSJ is as credible as the SC Skittles Mar 2022 #3

There's is NO Defense for Ginni Batshit Gaslit Thomas. Cha Mar 2022 #4

But Hunter Biden nt doc03 Mar 2022 #5

Their editorial page has been a joke since the neocon days of Paul Gigot et al. keep_left Mar 2022 #6