Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Freethinker65

(11,201 posts)
7. Tie it to temporarily reducing ethanol subsidies?
Mon Mar 14, 2022, 09:52 AM
Mar 2022

Manchin gets to see more US vehicles use more fossil fuel per fill up AND more corn production goes into the food supply chain instead of producing ethanol (which although cleaner burning, it's production is not so environmentally friendly). Manchin gets richer which is what this is about.
We need alternative energy investment and vehicles.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Christ, he is a worthless ignorant POS. CurtEastPoint Mar 2022 #1
I ever knew that our electricity SCantiGOP Mar 2022 #14
+1, He's got a point with supply chain but that's easily solvable with diversifying it. He's bought uponit7771 Mar 2022 #16
My thoughts exactly. Firestorm49 Mar 2022 #26
Not quite prepared to go that far... but it's gettin to that point. InAbLuEsTaTe Mar 2022 #32
The focus needs to be on the midterms, and winning a majority in the Senate by at least two seats, JohnSJ Mar 2022 #2
Yup. Make SineManchin irrelevant. lagomorph777 Mar 2022 #6
And everyone should get a lump of coal. dchill Mar 2022 #3
Fossil Fool lagomorph777 Mar 2022 #4
lol that name made me spit my 3PM Bellini Celerity Mar 2022 #11
Waiting for a battery what does he think they run on "D" cells nt doc03 Mar 2022 #5
Tie it to temporarily reducing ethanol subsidies? Freethinker65 Mar 2022 #7
He always moves the goal post at the last minute. brush Mar 2022 #8
Coalgaslighter who is doing massive heavy lifting in terms of fucking us for the midterms. Celerity Mar 2022 #9
Is he pushing for coal vehicles? spanone Mar 2022 #10
Maybe Manchinema would like area51 Mar 2022 #30
Cars have never run on coal you idiot! Boomerproud Mar 2022 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author Boomerproud Mar 2022 #13
Okay, let me fix this once and for all. hamsterjill Mar 2022 #15
x1000 BlueIdaho Mar 2022 #17
His point being BGBD Mar 2022 #18
The path to victory for a cleaner and greener america JustAnotherGen Mar 2022 #19
As much as I'd like to see Gottheimer out of congress, replaced by someone more progressive Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #29
I'd love to see him stay JustAnotherGen Mar 2022 #33
Gottheimer was instrumental in killing BBB by demanding BIF be voted on separately Fiendish Thingy Mar 2022 #34
I'm taking what he's saying as a great reason why xmas74 Mar 2022 #20
Then help build our on supply chain from reliable sources. nt Samrob Mar 2022 #21
"Can't do this......can't do that" Mad_Machine76 Mar 2022 #22
Manchin is full of coal tar! He will do anything to protect coal mine owners. nt Samrob Mar 2022 #23
He's a total craphead. Must be removed. BSdetect Mar 2022 #24
Pretty sure he does not understand what the future in automobiles is going to be. Ignorant? Selfish 634-5789 Mar 2022 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author demmiblue Mar 2022 #37
Hey, Joe. The electricity needed to charge the vehicles will largely come from coal. Midnight Writer Mar 2022 #27
"reluctance" is his version of COLLINS' "concern"? UTUSN Mar 2022 #28
I think we can use this to elect more Democrats elsewhere. Baitball Blogger Mar 2022 #31
so why not make batteries in WVA? doh! nt msongs Mar 2022 #35
He really is stupid enough to be a repub. Liberal In Texas Mar 2022 #36
In other words, Manchin announces for the fiftieth time what an attention seeking whore he is. nt artemisia1 Mar 2022 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Manchin says he's relucta...»Reply #7