Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

MineralMan

(149,849 posts)

8. Is there any corroboration for this?

Reply to Nevilledog (Original post)

Wed Feb 16, 2022, 03:24 PM

Feb 2022

Two threads on it, but just one link to lawandcrime.com, whatever that might be. I went to the site, which has the appearance of an ad-heavy clickbait site.

I need some additional sources here.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'Several' Jurors Who Rejected Palin's Defamation Suit Against the NYT knew judge dismissed [View all] Nevilledog Feb 2022 OP

Not suprising...they weren't sequestered...nt Wounded Bear Feb 2022 #1

Trying to open the door for a mistrial? EYESORE 9001 Feb 2022 #2

While in theory this could be fodder for an appeal, so long as the jurors all stick to their guns RockRaven Feb 2022 #3

Why would Jurors, in deliberation, have access to their cell phones? Chainfire Feb 2022 #4

They weren't sequestered PJMcK Feb 2022 #10

Even smart judges do dumb things. Most would wait until Tomconroy Feb 2022 #5

More would grant the motion for a directed verdict. Nevilledog Feb 2022 #6

He was reversed before on the case. Once bitten, twice shy. Tomconroy Feb 2022 #7

He's looking at #3 Nevilledog Feb 2022 #9

Is there any corroboration for this? MineralMan Feb 2022 #8