Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Zorro

(18,052 posts)
Wed Jan 26, 2022, 11:20 PM Jan 2022

Madison Cawthorn Lawyer Cites Confederate Amnesty Act To Defend Rep's Job [View all]

A lawyer for Rep. Madison Cawthorn (R-NC) cited an 1872 congressional action granting amnesty to Confederate soldiers to defend his own client’s eligibility for office.

The argument from Cawthorn lawyer James Bopp Jr. came in response to a legal effort to have Cawthorn declared ineligible for office because he allegedly “encouraged, and upon reasonable suspicion helped aid, the insurrection” on Jan. 6.

The legal challenge, from a group of North Carolina voters backed by the organization Free Speech For People, alleges that Cawthorn violated the third section of the 14th Amendment, which states, “No Person shall be a […] Representative in Congress […] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress […] to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same.”

On the phone with TPM Wednesday, Bopp said “there are substantial constitutional defenses, which include the fact that Congress passed the 1872 Amnesty Act, which removed all persons whatsoever from the disability under Section 3 as a result of engaging in an insurrection or rebellion.”

Though the Amnesty Act applied at the time to Confederate soldiers who fought in the Civil War, nothing in the law prevented it from being applied in the future, Bopp argued.

“There’s nothing in the Amnesty Act that says it’s only applicable to the Civil War, and it was very broad in its terms,” he said.

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/madison-cawthorn-lawyer-cites-confederate-amnesty-act-to-defend-reps-job-capitol-insurrection

Now that's some fancy lawyerin' there...

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
That's diggin' deep! dchill Jan 2022 #1
... highplainsdem Jan 2022 #2
Lol! Yeah I'm sure congressional intent was to grant amnesty to any future insurrectionists unblock Jan 2022 #3
+ struggle4progress Jan 2022 #13
Irony here inthewind21 Jan 2022 #20
He's right. James48 Jan 2022 #4
+ struggle4progress Jan 2022 #14
I had no idea that Cawthorn served in the CSA's military. NCjack Jan 2022 #5
Maybe he was in ROTC? keithbvadu2 Jan 2022 #7
Past life experience. n/t intheflow Jan 2022 #19
If that's their only defense, Mr.Bill Jan 2022 #6
Doesn't that strategy inherently imply guilt? nt Gore1FL Jan 2022 #8
It inthewind21 Jan 2022 #21
And Cawthorn's white hood comes out. n/t area51 Jan 2022 #9
Sounds a lot like an admission tirebiter Jan 2022 #10
So they're admitting to insurrection, but.. Bobstandard Jan 2022 #11
I looked up his lawyer, and he's a big deal and no dipshit MyMission Jan 2022 #12
One Nit To Pick ProfessorGAC Jan 2022 #25
I see your point MyMission Jan 2022 #26
That lawyer charges oligarch rates, I'm sure. Wonder who's footing Maddy's bill? (Nt) FreepFryer Jan 2022 #15
This is surreal blue-wave Jan 2022 #16
It seems to me the statute was unconstitutional on its face when passed. TomSlick Jan 2022 #17
Hope he gets paid in greybacks lame54 Jan 2022 #18
What kind of lawyer takes a case where they have to argue their client, the traitor, is Vinca Jan 2022 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author Prof. Toru Tanaka Jan 2022 #23
Maybe Because He Actually Wants To Get Paid! ProfessorGAC Jan 2022 #24
to bad there wasn't a big ol' black bear behind him ? might have been lunch?? monkeyman1 Jan 2022 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Madison Cawthorn Lawyer C...