Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

L. Coyote

(51,134 posts)

9. That letter was Jan. 3, the draft order was mid-December.

Reply to Trueblue Texan (Original post)

Wed Jan 26, 2022, 12:45 PM

Jan 2022

I would dig deeper regarding what was planned for Jan. 6 to explain the letter. The letter was intended to impact what could happen, not what did not happen.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Remember when 10 former secretaries of defense posted that op-ed... [View all] Trueblue Texan Jan 2022 OP

Christopher Miller needs to testify under oath gab13by13 Jan 2022 #1

i think they def heard rumblings. mopinko Jan 2022 #2

I think one reason they nixxed the plan... Wounded Bear Jan 2022 #3

That was the consensus of opinion at the time the letter was released. Ford_Prefect Jan 2022 #4

I'm afraid, though, that a few years hence that might not be the case... Wounded Bear Jan 2022 #5

Definitely. At the same time, there had to be loyalist colluders at very high levels who KPN Jan 2022 #8

The military seemed to make clear they wouldn't abet a coup Ponietz Jan 2022 #11

They tried to split Cyber Command and the NSA?! suegeo Jan 2022 #6

Dan Quayle may also have made a few calls obamanut2012 Jan 2022 #7

That letter was Jan. 3, the draft order was mid-December. L. Coyote Jan 2022 #9

Remember when the Pentagon suddenly stopped cooperating with the Biden transition Team? Hieronymus Phact Jan 2022 #10