Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Hav

(5,969 posts)

4. Is that remotely normal for judges to do?

Reply to Nevilledog (Original post)

Wed Nov 3, 2021, 06:32 PM

Nov 2021

Aren't there other venues to do that if he really needs to voice his frustration about what someone in the media said? This trial isn't there for him to amplify his views.
I wasn't really concerned about that use of the word victim decision but this seems really strange.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge in Rittenhouse case takes a break during the trial to complain about media coverage of his.. [View all] Nevilledog Nov 2021 OP

That's what the first amendment is about....you know from law school turbinetree Nov 2021 #1

Oh, cry me a river, judge! sakabatou Nov 2021 #2

Wow! spicysista Nov 2021 #3

Is that remotely normal for judges to do? Hav Nov 2021 #4

It's not the victim part it's the looter part lame54 Nov 2021 #12

Oh brother, another tRumpy narcissist. Hassler Nov 2021 #5

It's not clear from this clip gratuitous Nov 2021 #6

Don't think so......pretty sure away from jury. Nevilledog Nov 2021 #7

One certainly hopes so gratuitous Nov 2021 #8

Absolutely Nevilledog Nov 2021 #9

This freak needs to go! UTUSN Nov 2021 #10

Most judges I've known take criticism really badly. They sort of lose Tomconroy Nov 2021 #11

How old is this idiot? nt DURHAM D Nov 2021 #13