General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If it hasn't already been said, some support for Alec Baldwin as we know [View all]hlthe2b
(111,459 posts)responsibility for the actor is not unlike the surgeon being PRIMARILY responsible for ensuring the sterility of instruments and OR before they operate!) So, I suppose they would be willing to delay emergency surgery for the 3-5 hours required while their surgeon personally supervises sterilization of instruments and cleaning of the operating room (or the week-10 days for bacterial cultures to come back obtained from EVERYTHING) before that surgeon declares it safe to operate. (Unbelievable).
I'm happy to see this result in a "no live-capable guns on sets" policy in the future, but mere props plus CGI enhancement. But this excoriation of Baldwin for something he was NOT the professional hired to perform--when even the limited information available to date show that that professional was clearly not supervising or overseeing-- suggests to me something other than mere "concern."
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):