Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(53,018 posts)
8. that is not germane to the error made in the comparative components of your initial reply
Fri Mar 5, 2021, 05:57 AM
Mar 2021

Last edited Fri Mar 5, 2021, 07:51 AM - Edit history (1)



Your statement used the word now, which is not applicable to this particular subject, as Sanders always has used multi-year phase-ins for his wage increase bills. There is no new action in this bill compared to his past ones, thus your analogy is faulty.

Sanders is many things, but he is not a fool about macro and micro economics. He is well aware that more than doubling the baseline minimum wage in a single fiscal year would have serious systemic knock-on effects, and could possibly generate exogenous shocks that could have destabilising outcomes both large and small. A multi-year glidepath allows for much of that to be avoided.

Some of the potential drivers of that systemic turbulence would be due to the fact that it would not just be the sub 15 usd per hour workers who would get wage increases. Many more wage cohorts would also see increases as well, as there are a multiplicity of interlocks with negotiated labour contracts that are pegged to the minimum wage via an assortment of adjustment formulae.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"We're not talking about raising the minimum wage right now ... it's a five year process." betsuni Mar 2021 #1
Sanders' Raise The Wage Acts always had a multi-year phase-in periods. Celerity Mar 2021 #2
Not the point. betsuni Mar 2021 #3
It is the point. You were trying to make a analogy that was faulty in terms Celerity Mar 2021 #4
Anyone familiar with Bernie Sanders knows he thinks incrementalism is bad. betsuni Mar 2021 #5
Chalk and cheese. nt Celerity Mar 2021 #6
Anyone familiar with Bernie Sanders and his supporters knows incrementalism is bad. betsuni Mar 2021 #7
that is not germane to the error made in the comparative components of your initial reply Celerity Mar 2021 #8
No. betsuni Mar 2021 #9
Simply saying 'no' doesn't change anything. I have meticulously shown what I meant vis-a-vis Celerity Mar 2021 #10
"meticulously" betsuni Mar 2021 #11
'carefully', if you prefer that for the adverb Celerity Mar 2021 #12
No. betsuni Mar 2021 #13
I think it should be welcomed, from a far left that that has always wanted what they wanted and when OnDoutside Mar 2021 #14
Yes, now that Bernie is officially the Democratic establishment and we don't have to pretend he betsuni Mar 2021 #15
Oh yeah. There is a whole rehab of him going on with Nixie Mar 2021 #16
Yes! betsuni Mar 2021 #17
Yup, a lot of myth busting going on. Nixie Mar 2021 #19
Rep. Sanders H.R.2812 - Minimum Wage Restoration Act 2001 Donkees Mar 2021 #18
Incrementalism is good. Better is good, as PBO has said. OnDoutside Mar 2021 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»📺 @BernieSanders ...»Reply #8