Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Hugin

(37,105 posts)

5. It's a shame they can't charge on a per objection basis.

Reply to New Breed Leader (Original post)

Sun Nov 22, 2020, 10:43 AM

Nov 2020

Seems to me that $3,000/objection would be fair considering the administrative costs of nullifying a legitimate ballot.

The proof is on the objector, as in all other scientific and mathematical proofs.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump poll watchers obstruct recount in WI [View all] New Breed Leader Nov 2020 OP

Ah, the classic chickenshit or the egg question. ;) Chainfire Nov 2020 #1

Lock obstructionists up! SheltieLover Nov 2020 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author Chainfire Nov 2020 #3

Of course they do. That's their only real goal. MineralMan Nov 2020 #4

It's a shame they can't charge on a per objection basis. Hugin Nov 2020 #5

This seems like a great, great idea. Mike 03 Nov 2020 #6

Since it is Republican watchers disrupting the count, AnnaLee Nov 2020 #7

+1 LizBeth Nov 2020 #8