Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Buckeyeblue

(6,058 posts)
5. It would depend on how it was overturned I think
Wed Oct 28, 2020, 09:40 PM
Oct 2020

If they said the original ruling was incorrect and that bans on same-sex marriage do not violate equal protection then all of the laws and state constitutional amendments would be valid again. I think existing marriages would have to be grandfathered.

I think on the federal level the defense of marriage act could be replaced with a federal law that recognized that marriage is between two consenting adults, regardless of gender.

If this was done, the justices could overturn Oberkfell, but the the federal law would be the law of the land. Then, the question would be could states violate this rule? I don't think states would be able to violate it (meaning states would have o recognize th federal definition of marriage).

That's why if we win the presidency and the Senate there needs to be federal legislation affirming a number of human rights. It would be very difficult for the SC to say a federal law extending a right violated the constitution.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gay couples race to wed o...»Reply #5