Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hlthe2b

(111,637 posts)
4. There is a long-running revulsion against bringing Federal charges against a former President...
Sat Oct 3, 2020, 03:17 PM
Oct 2020

although they certainly can, if the statute of limitations have not run. Though I have to say this is largely a Democratic tradition (to not charge/prosecute) and R's most likely would do so against a former Dem President if given the chance.

But, the issue of state charges is distinctly different. They can be brought and unless there is a governing political structure within a state where offenses were committed that is protective/averse to such charges being brought (or a statute of limitation that prevents), then state prosecution is not unlikely. Just because it hasn't happened, doesn't mean it won't. Few former Presidents are likely to have left themselves so open to corruption charges, both state and Federal as Trump.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can Trump actually be pro...»Reply #4