General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Male Privilege [View all]Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)Pretty much right on que. At least she should be commended for being consistent, albeit irrationally consistent. Notice how she labels any attempt to "minimize the fact that women are paid less" as a "MRA talking point" and "hate speech".
You can read this government sponsored study which demonstrates exactly what I'm talking about, and you can find it referenced right on wikipedia. It explains in great detail the portion of the gender gap due to discrimination is "not very much" [page 2]. Also in this study you'll see that they found that for women and men who had never been married and never had a child, the gender pay gap actually favored women by 8% [page 25].
http://www.nber.org/papers/w11240.pdf
Wow! Empirical studies sponsored by the government are now MRA "hate speech"? Brilliant!
Either that or Redqueen is just trying to turn the debate into an emotional issue by spewing vile, ridiculous and false allegations when she can't possibly deal with facts and reason on an adult level. I'll let you decide which.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):