Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Liberal YouTubers
Related: About this forumTrump WH ORDERED to STOP SHREDDING EVIDENCE!!! - Meidas Touch
Trump and Susie Wiles and the rest of the White House Staff need to stop shredding and destroying presidential records, as a federal judge and GW Bush appointee, John Bates, has entered a preliminary injunction to order the Trump Presidency to preserve ALL records, including text messages and social media posts, and to stop using disappearing messaging apps, like Signal and WhatsApp.
Michael Popok examines the new court orders, and explains why the Court led off the order citing to George Orwells dystopian book 1984, and reminded the Trump Administration what is carved over the National Archives doors! - 05/22/2026.
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump WH ORDERED to STOP SHREDDING EVIDENCE!!! - Meidas Touch (Original Post)
Rhiannon12866
Yesterday
OP
Judge Orders White House to Preserve Officials' Text Messages (New York Times Gift Article)
LetMyPeopleVote
7 hrs ago
#2
Permanut
(8,587 posts)1. Boy, that will stop him for sure!
LetMyPeopleVote
(182,291 posts)2. Judge Orders White House to Preserve Officials' Text Messages (New York Times Gift Article)
The judge overruled a government memo from April, which rejected a records law that mandates preservation of all official presidential documents.
Link to tweet
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/20/us/politics/trump-court-text-messages.html?unlocked_article_code=1.kFA.y8fK.l-JyhA2k27XD&smid=nytcore-ios-share
A federal judge ordered the White House on Wednesday to preserve all presidential records including text messages exchanged among its top officials, telling the Trump administration that at least for now it must follow a law it had unilaterally declared unconstitutional.
The ruling by Judge John D. Bates of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia blocks a Justice Department memo and White House guidance in April maintaining that President Trumps White House records were his private property and that officials did not need to comply with the Presidential Records Act, particularly on preserving text messages.
While the presidency is a singularly important institution, that gravity does not free it from modest constraint, wrote Judge Bates, an appointee of President George W. Bush, adding, Congress has validly determined that this act helps to maintain that trust by shining some light on the activities of the president and his aides.
The order, which is set to take effect on Tuesday while the legal case moves forward, amounted to a major if temporary rebuke of an administration that has shown little regard for laws meant to provide the public a window into the workings of the government and create a detailed historical record of presidential decision-making.
The ruling by Judge John D. Bates of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia blocks a Justice Department memo and White House guidance in April maintaining that President Trumps White House records were his private property and that officials did not need to comply with the Presidential Records Act, particularly on preserving text messages.
While the presidency is a singularly important institution, that gravity does not free it from modest constraint, wrote Judge Bates, an appointee of President George W. Bush, adding, Congress has validly determined that this act helps to maintain that trust by shining some light on the activities of the president and his aides.
The order, which is set to take effect on Tuesday while the legal case moves forward, amounted to a major if temporary rebuke of an administration that has shown little regard for laws meant to provide the public a window into the workings of the government and create a detailed historical record of presidential decision-making.
trump cannot abolish or rescind the official records act with a legal opinion.