Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Judge Xinis DENIES an additional request by the government to further stay discovery in the Kilmar Abrego Garcia case.
Reposted by Aiding And Abetting Terrorists Hat
Anna Bower
@annabower.bsky.social
Follow
NEW: Judge Xinis DENIES an additional request by the government to further stay discovery in the Kilmar Abrego Garcia case.
For the reasons stated on the record during today's proceeding, 104
Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery is DENIED. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 4/30/2025. (bus, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 04/30/2025)
ALT
April 30, 2025 at 10:34 AM
@annabower.bsky.social
Follow
NEW: Judge Xinis DENIES an additional request by the government to further stay discovery in the Kilmar Abrego Garcia case.
For the reasons stated on the record during today's proceeding, 104
Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery is DENIED. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 4/30/2025. (bus, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 04/30/2025)
ALT
April 30, 2025 at 10:34 AM
NEW: Judge Xinis DENIES an additional request by the government to further stay discovery in the Kilmar Abrego Garcia case.
— Anna Bower (@annabower.bsky.social) 2025-04-30T14:34:07.408Z
Anna Bower
@annabower.bsky.social
Follow
There was no hearing noticed for today, as far as I’m aware. I assume that the “proceeding” referenced by Xinis was closed/sealed.
(The subject of the proceeding was the government’s motion to stay discovery, ECF 104, which was filed under seal.)
April 30, 2025 at 10:39 AM
@annabower.bsky.social
Follow
There was no hearing noticed for today, as far as I’m aware. I assume that the “proceeding” referenced by Xinis was closed/sealed.
(The subject of the proceeding was the government’s motion to stay discovery, ECF 104, which was filed under seal.)
April 30, 2025 at 10:39 AM
There was no hearing noticed for today, as far as I’m aware. I assume that the “proceeding†referenced by Xinis was closed/sealed.
— Anna Bower (@annabower.bsky.social) 2025-04-30T14:39:46.205Z
(The subject of the proceeding was the government’s motion to stay discovery, ECF 104, which was filed under seal.)