Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(64,684 posts)
Tue Apr 1, 2025, 10:50 AM Apr 1

Federal judge rules Monday that Alabama AG Steve Marshall acted unconstitutionally when he threatened to prosecute ...

Chris Geidner
@chrisgeidner.bsky.social‬

Follow
On Monday, a federal judge ruled that Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall acted unconstitutionally when he threatened to prosecute those who help Alabamians get abortions in states where they are legal.

Read about it at Law Dork: https://www.lawdork.com/p/alabama-yellowhammer-fund-final-judgment
(4) It is DECLARED that the defendant's use of the
provisions of Alabama's criminal code to prosecute
those who assist individuals seeking to leave Alabama
to obtain abortion care in a State where abortion is
legal would violate both the First Amendment and the
right to travel.
The court
retains jurisdiction
to issue
an
injunction to enforce the declaratory judgment and to
provide other relief, should such become necessary.
ALT
April 1, 2025 at 9:36 AM

On Monday, a federal judge ruled that Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall acted unconstitutionally when he threatened to prosecute those who help Alabamians get abortions in states where they are legal.

Read about it at Law Dork: www.lawdork.com/p/alabama-ye...

Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner.bsky.social) 2025-04-01T13:36:41.118Z
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal judge rules Monday that Alabama AG Steve Marshall acted unconstitutionally when he threatened to prosecute ... (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Apr 1 OP
Constitutions are for Losers BOSSHOG Apr 1 #1
These Red State AGs need to accept that women are people & citizens, NOT property of the state! Attilatheblond Apr 1 #2
The right to travel is an interesting concept. everyonematters Apr 1 #3
The GOP does not think women have a right to cross state lines. Irish_Dem Apr 1 #4
Its existence under privileges and immunities Frasier Balzov Apr 1 #5

Attilatheblond

(5,934 posts)
2. These Red State AGs need to accept that women are people & citizens, NOT property of the state!
Tue Apr 1, 2025, 10:56 AM
Apr 1

Glad to see judges standing up to these jerks who think they can treat women like cattle.

everyonematters

(3,797 posts)
3. The right to travel is an interesting concept.
Tue Apr 1, 2025, 10:58 AM
Apr 1

There is nothing in the constitution explicitly stating that there is a right to travel, but people have never been stopped from moving freely around the country. Is this an unenumerated right?

Frasier Balzov

(4,374 posts)
5. Its existence under privileges and immunities
Tue Apr 1, 2025, 12:08 PM
Apr 1

is sought to be tested again by Gozer the Gozerian.

Just like birthright citizenship.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»Federal judge rules Monda...