Civil Liberties
Related: About this forumSupreme Court majority sympathetic to coach who prayed at midfield
Supreme Court majority sympathetic to coach who prayed at midfield
But questions about Joe Kennedys actions and the school districts reasons for disciplining him might lead to narrow resolution
By Robert Barnes
Yesterday at 6:32 p.m. EDT

Former Bremerton High School assistant football coach Joe Kennedy takes a knee in front of the Supreme Court on Monday. (Win Mcnamee/Getty Images)
The Supreme Courts conservative justices seemed sympathetic Monday to a former high school football coach who lost his job after leading postgame prayers at midfield, but the path to a decision is complicated by both the coachs actions and the school districts purported reason for disciplining him.
Joseph A. Kennedys lawyer said the assistant coach was asking only for a private moment to take a knee and express gratitude to God on the gridiron after a game. But lawyer Paul D. Clement acknowledged that Kennedys actions at Bremerton High School near Seattle had at times gone far beyond that, including leading players and others in prayer.
And Richard B. Katskee, representing the Bremerton school district, said officials had an obligation to protect students from being coerced into religious activity they did not want. But justices said that might be rationalization, because the officials complaint to Kennedy was that his actions would be seen as government speech, violating constitutional commands against government endorsement of religion.
This may be a case about facts and not really much about law, said Justice Stephen G. Breyer, beginning his last week of oral arguments before his scheduled retirement at the end of the term. ... In general, Breyer and the courts other two liberals seemed to think Bremerton officials had tried to accommodate Kennedys request to pray silently after games, but that what he really wanted was a public platform to involve players and the greater community.
[Supreme Court takes up case of a coach and his prayers on 50-yard line]
{snip}
Mondays case is Kennedy v. Bremerton School District.
By Robert Barnes
Robert Barnes has been a Washington Post reporter and editor since 1987. He joined The Post to cover Maryland politics, and he has served in various editing positions, including metropolitan editor and national political editor. He has covered the Supreme Court since November 2006. Twitter https://twitter.com/scotusreporter

Evergreen Emerald
(13,095 posts)Would they be a sympathetic? That is the issue: no one religion should force itself on the community.
Separation of church and state
thomski64
(681 posts)...thought that was against our
"Religion"
lamp_shade
(15,209 posts)Walleye
(40,417 posts)Girard442
(6,641 posts)"Real Christians can pray anywhere, anytime. You infidels can go pound sand. I like beer."
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
GoldandSilver
(186 posts)This is an attempt to use this Supreme Court to put prayer (Christian only) back in school.
If this is allowed to stand, then using the exact same premise, I shall demand blood sacrifice and satanic chants shall be allowed to take place in a like manner and circumstance on every school property in the US!
Fucking Republikans are off the rails.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.