Why did the antebellum Northern factory owners not want to have slaves working in their factories?

[raccoon]

(Disclaimer: I think slavery is/was a terrible thing, I'm just trying to figure this out.)

It couldn't have been for just humanitarian reasons; greed and self-interest almost always trump that.

So...American history majors and history buffs, what are your thoughts?

[Tuesday Afternoon]

1. maybe start here

https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?p=reasons+slaves+were+not+used+in+the+north&ei=UTF-8&hspart=mozilla&hsimp=yhs-001


http://slavenorth.com/

African slavery is so much the outstanding feature of the South, in the unthinking view of it, that people often forget there had been slaves in all the old colonies. Slaves were auctioned openly in the Market House of Philadelphia; in the shadow of Congregational churches in Rhode Island; in Boston taverns and warehouses; and weekly, sometimes daily, in Merchant's Coffee House of New York. Such Northern heroes of the American Revolution as John Hancock and Benjamin Franklin bought, sold, and owned black people. William Henry Seward, Lincoln's anti-slavery Secretary of State during the Civil War, born in 1801, grew up in Orange County, New York, in a slave-owning family and amid neighbors who owned slaves if they could afford them. The family of Abraham Lincoln himself, when it lived in Pennsylvania in colonial times, owned slaves.[1]

When the minutemen marched off to face the redcoats at Lexington in 1775, the wives, boys and old men they left behind in Framingham took up axes, clubs, and pitchforks and barred themselves in their homes because of a widespread, and widely credited, rumor that the local slaves planned to rise up and massacre the white inhabitants while the militia was away.[2]

African bondage in the colonies north of the Mason-Dixon Line has left a legacy in the economics of modern America and in the racial attitudes of the U.S. working class. Yet comparatively little is written about the 200-year history of Northern slavery. Robert Steinfeld's deservedly praised "The Invention of Free Labor" (1991) states, "By 1804 slavery had been abolished throughout New England," ignoring the 1800 census, which shows 1,488 slaves in New England. Recent archaeological discoveries of slave quarters or cemeteries in Philadelphia and New York City sometimes are written up in newspaper headlines as though they were exhibits of evidence in a case not yet settled (cf. �African Burial Ground Proves Northern Slavery,� The City Sun, Feb. 24, 1993).

http://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0LEVjnBBrhUY3oABwUlnIlQ;_ylu=X3oDMTByZHI5MXByBHNlYwNzcg

[Steerpike]

2. White workers

would kill them...and the factory owners and anyone in the immediate vicinity. Common knowledge many white people did not want slavery in the north becouse...THEY NEEDED THE JOBS TO LIVE!