Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(65,026 posts)
Wed Apr 16, 2025, 02:34 PM Apr 16

UK Supreme Court says legal definition of 'woman' excludes trans women, in landmark ruling

Source: CNN

UK Supreme Court says legal definition of ‘woman’ excludes trans women, in landmark ruling

By Sana Noor Haq, CNN
4 minute read
Updated 11:06 AM EDT, Wed April 16, 2025

London (CNN) — The United Kingdom’s highest court ruled that the legal definition of “woman” excludes trans women, in a case with sweeping consequences for how equality laws are applied.

Britain’s Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the definition of a woman in equality legislation refers to “a biological woman and biological sex,” sparking celebrations outside court among gender-critical campaigners but warnings it was a “worrying” development for transgender people.

The case centered on whether trans women with a gender recognition certificate (GRC) – which offers legal recognition of someone’s female sex – are protected from discrimination as a woman under the nation’s Equality Act 2010.

A group of campaigners in Scotland brought a challenge in 2018, arguing that those rights should only safeguard those assigned as women at birth. But the Scottish government said that a trans woman with a GRC is legally a woman and should therefore be afforded the same legal protections.

-snip-

Read more: https://edition.cnn.com/2025/04/16/uk/uk-supreme-court-ruling-definition-woman-intl/index.html

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
UK Supreme Court says legal definition of 'woman' excludes trans women, in landmark ruling (Original Post) Eugene Apr 16 OP
Oh my... hlthe2b Apr 16 #1
This is a sick ruling LostOne4Ever Apr 16 #2

hlthe2b

(109,736 posts)
1. Oh my...
Wed Apr 16, 2025, 02:39 PM
Apr 16

I won't give "voice" to how SCOTUS might use this as justification for their own future rulings... But, it is concerning.

LostOne4Ever

(9,654 posts)
2. This is a sick ruling
Wed Apr 16, 2025, 09:42 PM
Apr 16

The entire world has turned sick with hate.

I am disgusted beyond words.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»LGBT»UK Supreme Court says leg...