Illinois
Related: About this forumCharges dropped against couple in Broadview immigration protest after federal grand jury refuses to indict
A federal grand jury has refused to indict a Chicago couple arrested during a violent protest outside the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Broadview last month, a rare move that prompted prosecutors to abruptly drop the case and signals government overreach in bringing the charges in the first place.
After the charges were officially dropped in court Wednesday morning, Richard Kling, the attorney for one of the defendants, called the grand jurys rejection of the case an extraordinary happenstance, especially in Chicagos federal court.
I think the grand jurors in the Northern District (of Illinois) stood up for the First Amendment right to protest, and also reject Gestapo-like troops on the streets of Chicago and neighboring communities, Kling said.
Ray Collins, 21, and Jocelyne Robledo, 30, a husband and wife from the South Side of Chicago, were each allegedly carrying loaded guns with them as they scuffled with officers who were trying to widen a security perimeter during a melee in late September.
Both have lawful permits to carry the firearms, but they were facing felony charges of assaulting or resisting a federal officer in performance of official duties, which carries up to 8 years in prison.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/10/08/charges-dropped-couple-broadview-protest-grand-jury/
Feds keep coming up with weak cases.....

rzemanfl
(30,881 posts)bucolic_frolic
(52,771 posts)Mostly seemed hand-in-glove with prosecutors.
obamanut2012
(28,911 posts)The ham sandwich trope was pretty accurate.
Frasier Balzov
(4,616 posts)OLDMDDEM
(2,811 posts)alleged witnessed by ICE. There have been many of these cases that were not indicted. I wonder how many more are coming.
MichMan
(16,071 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(171,233 posts)Its the latest example in Trumps second term of what was previously an extremely rare phenomenon of grand jurors refusing to return indictments.
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/chicago-ice-trump-grand-juries-indictments-law-order-rcna236391
That led federal prosecutors in the Northern District of Illinois to move to dismiss the charges Wednesday. Immigration officials had touted the arrests in the case last month, writing on social media that the defendants will be prosecuted and held accountable.
While the facts of every case are different and grand jury deliberations are secret, the bottom-line pattern of these rejections is impossible to ignore. Its difficult to overstate how rare it is for grand juries to reject indictments yet, these days, its not so unusual in the Trump Justice Department. Whether grand jurors are finding that prosecutors are overcharging, or grand jurors are refusing to return indictments despite finding sufficient evidence to proceed or some combination thereof this ongoing phenomenon is one of the most remarkable developments of Trumps second term.
The Illinois dismissal coincided with the arraignment of former FBI Director James Comey on Wednesday morning, whose charges Trump himself had demanded. In that case, led by an inexperienced former Trump personal lawyer over the objection of career prosecutors, Washington-area grand jurors in Northern Virginia rejected one of the three counts proposed by the administration. Comey pleaded not guilty.