Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(74,244 posts)
Sun May 18, 2025, 05:06 AM 6 hrs ago

Despite Darrell Issa opposition, his opponent and 3 groups, allowed to intervene in election lawsuit

On Friday in San Diego, US District Court Judge Andrew Schopler issued an order allowing me, Curtis Morrison, and three pro-voter interest groups to intervene as co-defendants in Issa v Weber, a lawsuit Rep. Darrell Issa (CA-48) filed in March to stop California from counting ballots postmarked on or before election day that don’t arrive by election day. The three interest groups are Vet Voice, CARA, and the League of Women Voters California.

Under California law, absentee ballots are counted if received within seven days of the election, and Issa doesn’t like that. In his complaint, Issa alleges that his former colleague in Congress, Rep. Michelle Steel, lost her election due to absentee ballots arriving after election day. He fears the same could happen to him......

1) Intervenors may not have been allowed to intervene as a matter of right if it wasn’t for Trump’s issuance of an Executive Order threatening to pull funding from states that allowed for the counting of votes received after the election. Judge Schopler recognized and agreed with the argument made by intervenors Vet Voice and CARA that Trump’s order could put the defendant, CA Secretary of State Shirley Weber in a position where she may not be able to adequately represent the interests of the intervenors.

2) Issa’s Judicial Watch attorney Eric Lee had argued in a court filing as well as in oral arguments that it was speculative whether I had an interest in the lawsuit as a candidate, because the lawsuit concerns the general election and it is speculative whether I would survive as one of the top two vote getters in the June 2025 primary to advance to the general election. Judge Schoper noted that concern is also true of Issa himself which could undermine his standing, a point that I made in my reply brief. Thus, Judge Schopler prepared the parties that he needed us to brief whether Issa even has standing to bring the lawsuit.



https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/5/17/2322924/-Despite-Darrell-Issa-opposition-his-opponent-and-3-groups-allowed-to-intervene-in-election-lawsuit

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Despite Darrell Issa opposition, his opponent and 3 groups, allowed to intervene in election lawsuit (Original Post) RandySF 6 hrs ago OP
Asshat. vanlassie 3 hrs ago #1
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»Despite Darrell Issa oppo...