Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Something to ponder, Why is the World Series called the World Series when no other countries in the World, except for (Original Post) debm55 Wednesday OP
I figure just marketing in order to match the "World Cup" in soccer.... walkingman Wednesday #1
Thank you walkingman, I will do. My Pirates aren't going anywhere, I'm afraid. debm55 Wednesday #4
When the Series was first played in 1903 Oeditpus Rex Wednesday #2
Why don't they make it real World Series and make it open to other countries. Thank you.for the information. Oeditpus debm55 Wednesday #3
I guess Oeditpus Rex Wednesday #7
Thank you very much, Oeditpus Rex. I see your point. debm55 Wednesday #8
this. AllaN01Bear Wednesday #9
In 1743, a children's book was published in England Oeditpus Rex Wednesday #12
Thank you for the information. Oeditpus Rex. debm55 Thursday #17
Thank you very much AllNOIBear. How did getting the crown go??? debm55 Wednesday #13
...not to mention the arrogance of them calling it the 'Miss Universe' pageant when... LudwigPastorius Wednesday #5
HAHAHHAHAHha. Thank you LudwigPastoius. debm55 Wednesday #6
This message was self-deleted by its author AllaN01Bear Wednesday #10
This message was self-deleted by its author AllaN01Bear Wednesday #11
This message was self-deleted by its author eppur_se_muova Wednesday #14
One baseball myth that just won't die is that the "World Series" was named for the New York World newspaper ... eppur_se_muova Wednesday #15
Thank you for sharing , eppur_se_muova. thank you for sharing the information. debm55 Thursday #16
The answer is arrogance. For Americans, there is no "world" outside the US. malthaussen Friday #18
That was my thought too. Thank you, Mal. debm55 Friday #19

walkingman

(9,576 posts)
1. I figure just marketing in order to match the "World Cup" in soccer....
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 03:09 PM
Wednesday

But if you want to see the best players in the world at every position competing for the highest prize in baseball, tune in to the World Series this year and watch the Houston Astros and the Los Angeles Dodgers go head-to-head (My prediction). ☮

It doesn’t get better than that.

Oeditpus Rex

(42,108 posts)
2. When the Series was first played in 1903
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 03:10 PM
Wednesday

we arrogantly assumed the U.S. was the only country in which baseball was played. As a professional sport, we were no doubt correct, but also unaware it'd been played recreationally in Japan since the 1880s.

But, hell, it wasn't even invented here, but somewhere in England -- possibly the West Midlands or Wales. (The Welsh still play their own style that's about 250 years old.)

We continue to call it the "World Series" knowing it's played professionally in other countries and as a club sport around the world just as a matter of tradition, I suppose.

debm55

(48,514 posts)
3. Why don't they make it real World Series and make it open to other countries. Thank you.for the information. Oeditpus
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 03:19 PM
Wednesday

Rex,

Oeditpus Rex

(42,108 posts)
7. I guess
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 03:55 PM
Wednesday

that's what baseball's World Cup is for. The problem in that, though, is an MLB player from, say, he Dominican Republic cn choose to play for the DR team.
So, it's more like the Olympic Games than MLB versus everyone else.

I honestly believe the MLB powers that be are afraid of Japan or Taiwan or somebody beating an MLB all-star team (or our most recent "world" champion) in a traditional world series, so they don't want it played that way.

Oeditpus Rex

(42,108 posts)
12. In 1743, a children's book was published in England
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 06:00 PM
Wednesday

titled A Pretty Little Pocket-Book. It had a children's game for each letter of the alphabet, and noted that 'B' was for "base ball." The accompanying poem read:

The ball once struck off,
Away flies the boy
Onto the next post
And then home with joy.

On the facing page was a woodcut illustration of a kid rounding the first post (wooden posts three feet high or so were used instead of the bags that were later familiar).

LudwigPastorius

(12,971 posts)
5. ...not to mention the arrogance of them calling it the 'Miss Universe' pageant when...
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 03:25 PM
Wednesday

there are nothing but human contestants.

Response to LudwigPastorius (Reply #5)

Response to LudwigPastorius (Reply #5)

Response to debm55 (Original post)

eppur_se_muova

(39,454 posts)
15. One baseball myth that just won't die is that the "World Series" was named for the New York World newspaper ...
Wed Jul 16, 2025, 11:33 PM
Wednesday
Origin of the Name "World Series"

One baseball myth that just won't die is that the "World Series" was named for the New York World newspaper, which supposedly sponsored the earliest contests. It didn't, and it wasn't.

In fact, the postseason series between the AL and NL champs was originally known as the "Championship of the World" or "World's Championship Series." That was shortened through usage to "World's Series" and finally to "World Series."

This usage can be traced through the annual baseball guides. Spalding's Base Ball Guide for 1887 reported the results of the 1886 postseason series between Chicago, champions of the National League, and St. Louis, champions of the American Association, under the heading "The World's Championship." As the editor noted, the two leagues "both entitle their championship contests each season as those for the base ball championship of the United States," so a more grandiose name was required to describe the postseason showdown between the two "champions of the United States."

But the Spalding Guide -- which, after all, was published by one of the world's largest sporting goods companies, with a vested interest in bringing baseball to other lands -- had grander ambitions. By 1890, the Spalding Guide was explaining that "[t]he base ball championship of the United States necessarily includes that of the entire world, though the time will come when Australia will step in as a rival, and after that country will come Great Britain; but all that is for the future."

This didn't happen, but the name "World's Championship Series" stuck. Reporting on the first modern postseason series, the Red Sox-Pirates battle of 1903, the 1904 Reach Guide called it the "World's Championship Series." By 1912, Reach's headline spoke of the "World's Series," while editor Francis Richter's text still referred to the "World's Championship Series." The Reach Guide switched from "World's Series" to "World Series" in 1931, retaining the modern usage through its merger with the Spalding Guide and through its final issue in 1941. The separately-edited Spalding Guide used "World's Series" through 1916, switching to "World Series" in the 1917 edition.

The Spalding-Reach Guide was replaced as Major League Baseball's semi-official annual by the Sporting News Guide, first published in 1942. The Sporting News Guide used "World's Series" from 1942 through 1963, changing to "World Series" in the 1964 edition.

Moreover, the New York World never claimed any connection with postseason baseball. The World was a tabloid much given to flamboyant self-promotion. If it had been involved in any way with sponsoring a championship series, the fact would have been emblazoned across its sports pages for months. I reviewed every issue of the World for the months leading up to the 1903 and 1905 World's Championship Series -- there's not a word suggesting any link between the paper and the series.

http://roadsidephotos.sabr.org/baseball/name.htm

SABR is the Society for American Baseball Research

malthaussen

(18,178 posts)
18. The answer is arrogance. For Americans, there is no "world" outside the US.
Fri Jul 18, 2025, 01:26 PM
Friday

It wasn't always called that, but hyperbole comes to us all.

-- Mal

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Something to ponder, Why ...