Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(113,764 posts)
Sun Oct 13, 2024, 03:52 PM Sunday

Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court confirmation looked bad at the time. It was even worse

President Trump and his party never cared a bit about whether Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted women.

Kavanaugh's 2018 confirmation to the Supreme Court was going to be rammed through no matter what, a new report shows.

Trump was not exactly the kind of executive for whom allegations of sexual assault would ever be a deal breaker. He has since been found liable for what a judge described as “rape” and had previously boasted about sexually assaulting women just because he could.

And thanks in part to Kavanaugh’s elevation to the high court, we now live in a country where reproductive rights have been ripped away from women and a president could arguably get away with murder.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/abcarian-brett-kavanaughs-supreme-court-100002097.html

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court confirmation looked bad at the time. It was even worse (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sunday OP
New allegations about Kavanaugh's FBI probe spark awkward questions LetMyPeopleVote Sunday #1
Any time Susan Collins expresses some form of "concern" we know she's part of the plot. erronis Sunday #2

LetMyPeopleVote

(153,204 posts)
1. New allegations about Kavanaugh's FBI probe spark awkward questions
Sun Oct 13, 2024, 06:10 PM
Sunday

In 2018, Susan Collins said the FBI background check into Brett Kavanaugh appeared to be “a very thorough investigation.” New evidence suggests otherwise.




Exactly six years ago this week, Susan Collins was impressed with the FBI's background check into Brett Kavanaugh. "It appears to be a very thorough investigation," the Republican said.

Yeah, about that...

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/new-allegations-kavanaughs-fbi-probe-spark-awkward-questions-rcna174652

Just two days before the Senate’s confirmation vote, with the FBI review ostensibly complete, Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine said it appeared to be “a very thorough investigation.”

That was exactly six years ago this week. Collins’ assessment seemed badly flawed at the time, but it looks considerably worse now. As my MSNBC colleague Clarissa-Jan Lim explained:

The Trump administration did not allow the FBI to conduct a full-scale investigation into the sexual misconduct allegations against Brett Kavanaugh that threatened his Supreme Court confirmation, according to a new report, disputing then-President Donald Trump’s public claims at the time.


In 2018, at the height of the controversy, the late-Sen. Dianne Feinstein — at the time, the Senate Judiciary Committee’s ranking member — said that the FBI’s report on Kavanaugh “looks to be a product of an incomplete investigation that was limited perhaps by the White House.”....

That, of course, was what the then-president had to say in public. In private, according to Whitehouse’s findings, the Trump administration not only “kneecap[ed] FBI investigators’ ability to adequately investigate those allegations, but the lack of transparency misled the Senate and the public about the investigation’s thoroughness.”

Kavanaugh and the FBI declined to comment, and the Trump campaign called the findings an “attempt to delegitimize the Supreme Court” (which, incidentally, the former president has tried to delegitimize.)

Speaking of the GOP candidate, the year after Trump left the White House, he said, in reference to Kavanaugh, “I saved his life. He wouldn’t even be in a law firm. Who would have had him? Nobody. Totally disgraced. Only I saved him. ... I saved his life, and I saved his career.”

It was a curious quote, which is now seen in a new light.

erronis

(16,639 posts)
2. Any time Susan Collins expresses some form of "concern" we know she's part of the plot.
Sun Oct 13, 2024, 07:11 PM
Sunday

Dear Auntie - you should have stayed home and done the "good wife" stuff instead of f'ing up democracy.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme...