Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 06:20 PM Feb 2013

S.E.C. Acts on Suspicious Heinz Trading

Source: New York Times

Regulators investigating possible insider trading in the $23 billion takeover of H. J. Heinz have frozen a Goldman Sachs customer account linked to suspicious trades, according to a court filing on Friday.

In the filing made in Federal District Curt in Manhattan, the Securities and Exchange Commission took aim at a Zurich-based trading account that reaped $1.7 million in gains. The emergency action against anonymous traders, the S.E.C. said on Friday, will prevent the suspects from hiding their winnings or moving the money to another account.

The trading account belonged to a customer of Goldman. In its complaint on Friday, the S.E.C. referred to “GS Bank” and “GS & Co c/o Zurich Office,” an apparent reference to the bank.

Goldman on Friday said it was “cooperating with the S.E.C.’s investigation.” It has not been accused of any wrongdoing.

Read more: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/02/15/s-e-c-acts-on-suspicious-heinz-trading/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
S.E.C. Acts on Suspicious Heinz Trading (Original Post) IDemo Feb 2013 OP
Big Food & Big Money = Big Sleazy Speculation. Berlum Feb 2013 #1
Well most of their bonuses were cut back...LOL...Do I need the sarcasm thingy? monmouth3 Feb 2013 #2
$1.7m is peanuts. Who's benefitting, that's not being watched? TheMadMonk Feb 2013 #3
Anticipation? Bossy Monkey Feb 2013 #4
If they'd reaped $17 billion in returns it would be fine high density Feb 2013 #5

high density

(13,397 posts)
5. If they'd reaped $17 billion in returns it would be fine
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 07:21 PM
Feb 2013

Because then it would be too big to prosecute.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»S.E.C. Acts on Suspicious...