Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(174,378 posts)
Mon Jul 13, 2026, 04:03 PM 9 hrs ago

De Beers to Shutter South African Diamond Mine to Save Cash

Source: Yahoo! Finance/Bloomberg

Mon, July 13, 2026 at 5:04 AM EDT


(Bloomberg) -- Diamond giant De Beers plans to halt production at its South African mine for two years, as the one-time monopoly continues to wrestle with one of the deepest crises to ever hit the industry.

The $80 billion industry is under severe strain. What started as a post-pandemic slump worsened amid a pullback in Chinese luxury spending and the rising popularity of synthetic stones. Trade tensions and war in the Middle East have piled on even more pain.

De Beers has sought to lower production to try and support prices, but a glut of stones from Angola and weak demand has undermined those efforts.

The company said Monday that it now intends to shutter its Venetia mine in South Africa for two years as part of ongoing cost-cutting plan. The decision won't impact its output goals as it would produce more stones elsewhere.

Read more: https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/commodities/articles/beers-shutter-south-african-diamond-090448509.html



Heard a blip on the radio in a business report last night and was like whoa.
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
De Beers to Shutter South African Diamond Mine to Save Cash (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 9 hrs ago OP
Perhaps the closing of that mine will encourage the folks who make lab diamonds. CaliforniaPeggy 9 hrs ago #1
There's no reason to buy a mined diamond anymore. yardwork 9 hrs ago #2
Why does anyone want to buy jewelry? Is it to impress other people? And then there are people who spend money they 3Hotdogs 8 hrs ago #3
Slight possibility that jewelry buyers GenThePerservering 8 hrs ago #4
What's to like about 'em? 3Hotdogs 8 hrs ago #6
In ancient times BumRushDaShow 8 hrs ago #9
They're shiny, and JoseBalow 8 hrs ago #10
What I like about them: they decorate my face and they are beautiful in their own right. ...n/t CaliforniaPeggy 6 hrs ago #14
I agree w/ your sentiment! It's like that 'look at me, look at all of my diamonds, look at my expensive car, look, SWBTATTReg 8 hrs ago #8
Goddess forfend that we should find a moment of joy and beauty niyad 33 min ago #24
Because they're pretty, artistic, interestingly designed etc electric_blue68 7 hrs ago #12
As do I. And for years, I worked with, and represented, jewelry makers niyad 31 min ago #25
Why? Because a piece is beautiful, or makes us happy, for starters. niyad 43 min ago #23
Definitely the case Bluetus 7 hrs ago #13
I have a lab-grown diamond, too. It's beautiful. No need to every buy a new diamond. Liberty Belle 5 hrs ago #21
orher than use for grinding, why bother with diamonds WorseDayEver 8 hrs ago #5
Diamonds are not and never were rare. They just did a super amazing job of marketing. Raftergirl 8 hrs ago #7
Actually, the control of the distribution is what drove rarity and price mdbl 6 hrs ago #15
But not because diamonds are actually rare. De Beers limited the mining solely to be able to sell diamonds as Raftergirl 6 hrs ago #17
Bingo ! When the mines in Kimberly were first being worked, even working-class couples were buying huge diamond eppur_se_muova 2 hrs ago #22
My husband and I don't have rings. Envirogal 7 hrs ago #11
Rings are symbols. But if you don't like them, then don't wear them. CaliforniaPeggy 6 hrs ago #16
It's beautiful and authentic artwork FakeNoose 6 hrs ago #18
Thanks so much, my dear FakeNoose! CaliforniaPeggy 6 hrs ago #19
Rings are not the only kinds of jewelry out there. niyad 30 min ago #26
"To save cash" as if it didn't have EXCESSIVE funds just sitting in numbers accounts... what a crock WorseDayEver 5 hrs ago #20

CaliforniaPeggy

(157,421 posts)
1. Perhaps the closing of that mine will encourage the folks who make lab diamonds.
Mon Jul 13, 2026, 04:11 PM
9 hrs ago

These are not fake or copy-cat stones. They are real diamonds, having been designated that way. They are exactly like the stones dug out of mines. I have a pair and they are truly lovely and boy do they sparkle!

3Hotdogs

(15,843 posts)
3. Why does anyone want to buy jewelry? Is it to impress other people? And then there are people who spend money they
Mon Jul 13, 2026, 04:52 PM
8 hrs ago

can't afford or go into debt to buy jewelry or cars to impress other people. As for me, If I like someone, I don't want or need to impress them. It was only people that I, deep down didn't like, that I felt I needed to impress.

After I figured that out, I stopped buying expensive cars, clothing or whatever. My car is a utilitarian Hyundai Elantra and it gets me from point A to point B just as good as any Beemer or Ferrari on the road.

BumRushDaShow

(174,378 posts)
9. In ancient times
Mon Jul 13, 2026, 05:35 PM
8 hrs ago

and even today in some cultures, it's literally used as currency for financial transactions.

Hell, the "sell your gold (including jewelry) for cash" is a "thing", with roving "road shows".

CaliforniaPeggy

(157,421 posts)
14. What I like about them: they decorate my face and they are beautiful in their own right. ...n/t
Mon Jul 13, 2026, 07:02 PM
6 hrs ago

SWBTATTReg

(26,587 posts)
8. I agree w/ your sentiment! It's like that 'look at me, look at all of my diamonds, look at my expensive car, look,
Mon Jul 13, 2026, 05:25 PM
8 hrs ago

look, look! at what I have!'.

This materialistic society needs to disappear and realize what's really important in the 'real world'.

It's too bad that material objects are obsessing so many people.

niyad

(135,915 posts)
24. Goddess forfend that we should find a moment of joy and beauty
Tue Jul 14, 2026, 01:14 AM
33 min ago

in this "real world". And who defines that reality? Based on what criteria? When I was in high school, I heard reality defined as "an agreed-upon fiction". So what should those who do not agree to the fiction do?

electric_blue68

(28,166 posts)
12. Because they're pretty, artistic, interestingly designed etc
Mon Jul 13, 2026, 06:15 PM
7 hrs ago

I only have some with semi-precious stones or water pearls. Others are only metal, or with glass, wood, ceramics etc

Even on some rare occasion to impress people; basically it's because I enjoy the way they look.

And I make my own jewelry, too.

niyad

(135,915 posts)
25. As do I. And for years, I worked with, and represented, jewelry makers
Tue Jul 14, 2026, 01:16 AM
31 min ago

and other artists. I loved every minute of it.

niyad

(135,915 posts)
23. Why? Because a piece is beautiful, or makes us happy, for starters.
Tue Jul 14, 2026, 01:04 AM
43 min ago

The same reason many people buy, or create, other kinds of art, music, etc. What an iincredibly negative view of human endeavors your posts seem to indicate. How very, very sad.

Bluetus

(3,443 posts)
13. Definitely the case
Mon Jul 13, 2026, 06:25 PM
7 hrs ago

There is an episode from the original Mission: Impossible TV series where the team created a fake operation that supposedly held the key to manufacturing diamonds. I did not see that episode until about 5 years ago, when manufactured diamonds were commonplace, and about 1/3 the cost (and better quality) of mined stones.

There was a Twilight Zone episode where a gang of crooks stole a huge number of gold bars, and put themselves into suspended animation inside a cave for 100 years, thinking they would awake long after everybody had forgotten about the gold theft, and they would be filthy rich. The plot twist was that, in the meantime, a process had been invented to make unlimited supplies of gold cheap.

F Elon Musk, DeBeers, and all those Apartheid bastards. Let them go out of business.

Liberty Belle

(9,712 posts)
21. I have a lab-grown diamond, too. It's beautiful. No need to every buy a new diamond.
Mon Jul 13, 2026, 08:43 PM
5 hrs ago

I think older stones at an antique store are alright, as they've already been mined and sold before. But don't buy from any new diamonds from jewelry stores or other new diamond retailers. They're called blood diamonds for a reason--the horrific conditions for the miners and their families.

Raftergirl

(2,050 posts)
7. Diamonds are not and never were rare. They just did a super amazing job of marketing.
Mon Jul 13, 2026, 05:06 PM
8 hrs ago

I like jewelry. I also like diamonds. They are pretty. I inherited mine, they were my grandmother’s.

My engagement ring is a sapphire. Like Diana’s. Only smaller.

My husband just bid on a pair of tiny diamond studs at a silent auction for an organization that he sits on the board. They are smaller than my other studs, so good for every day, and I can sleep in them. His winning bid was half the retail price.


mdbl

(9,121 posts)
15. Actually, the control of the distribution is what drove rarity and price
Mon Jul 13, 2026, 07:03 PM
6 hrs ago

DeBeers has been controlling that market for decades.

Raftergirl

(2,050 posts)
17. But not because diamonds are actually rare. De Beers limited the mining solely to be able to sell diamonds as
Mon Jul 13, 2026, 07:20 PM
6 hrs ago

an expensive luxury item, desired by women around the world. Marketing genius.

There are many gemstones that are actually rare and they command extraordinary prices.

eppur_se_muova

(43,026 posts)
22. Bingo ! When the mines in Kimberly were first being worked, even working-class couples were buying huge diamond
Mon Jul 13, 2026, 11:18 PM
2 hrs ago

wedding rings, because the stones were so abundant that prices kept falling. Smuggling of diamonds in pockets, mouths, and body cavities brought the prices even lower, since the smugglers were often poor laborers desperate for a quick sale. Rhodes and his allies, incorporated as DeBeers, bought every mining concession they could (each being only a few feet wide) until they controlled the majority of the market, then began to squeeze everyone else out, so that profit margins were pushed higher and higher.

Early stage of mining in Kimberly. Each claimant measured out a square or rectangular plot and began digging straight down, from one edge to the opposite. Faster diggers quickly made deeper holes -- and anything that tumbled down into them from one of the slower diggers became their property.


A later stage of mining in "The Big Hole". Each rope corresponds to a claim -- buckets were hauled up the ropes from the ever-lower dig sites to screening stations above ground.


Today, "The Big Hole" is abandoned and partially filled with water. It is believed to be the deepest hole ever dug by hand.

Described in considerable detail in Rhodes' bio: https://archive.org/details/foundercecilrhod0000rotb_p0z9/mode/2up

Envirogal

(355 posts)
11. My husband and I don't have rings.
Mon Jul 13, 2026, 06:03 PM
7 hrs ago

It’s a scam to make men feel guilty and girls to expect too much based an exploitative and corrupt industry. Water should be valued over diamonds and yet, we have a
Warped view of value. Besides, wearing a ring is a pain, gross on you hands, etc..

A ring means nothing but marketing. Had one for my first marriage and it lasted less than two year. The “no ring” relationship has been going strong for decades.

Manufactured is the way to go if you must have one
And the technology has improved greatly since the days of cubic zirconium.

CaliforniaPeggy

(157,421 posts)
16. Rings are symbols. But if you don't like them, then don't wear them.
Mon Jul 13, 2026, 07:11 PM
6 hrs ago

My then-fiance and I did like the idea of a lost-wax ring, and that's what we got for me. It was made by a local artisan who was probably a student at the local college.

See?



I'm still wearing it and we've been married for 61 years.

FakeNoose

(43,388 posts)
18. It's beautiful and authentic artwork
Mon Jul 13, 2026, 07:20 PM
6 hrs ago

I hope it's comfortable to wear, it looks like it would be.....

CaliforniaPeggy

(157,421 posts)
19. Thanks so much, my dear FakeNoose!
Mon Jul 13, 2026, 07:25 PM
6 hrs ago

I appreciate your kindness. And it is very comfortable to wear.



WorseDayEver

(19 posts)
20. "To save cash" as if it didn't have EXCESSIVE funds just sitting in numbers accounts... what a crock
Mon Jul 13, 2026, 08:41 PM
5 hrs ago
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»De Beers to Shutter South...