Supreme Court allows a ruling that ends a tool to protect minority voters in 7 states
Source: NPR
Updated June 22, 2026 3:37 PM ET
By declining to take up a lower court ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court has dealt another blow to the Voting Rights Act.
The court announced Monday that it will not review an Arkansas-based lawsuit, leaving in place a 2025 appeals panel ruling that ends a long-used tool for protecting minority voters from discrimination under the landmark law in seven mainly Midwestern states.
That ruling found that in the states covered by the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota private individuals and groups do not have the right to sue to enforce what's known as Section 208 of the Voting Rights Act, which generally allows voters with a disability or inability to read or write to get help with voting from a person of their choice.
The Supreme Court's move comes almost two months after its conservative supermajority issued a major ruling that further weakened the Voting Rights Act, setting off a groundswell in redistricting across the country.
Read more: https://www.npr.org/2026/06/22/nx-s1-5863532/supreme-court-voting-rights-act-private-right-arkansas
Link to ORDER (PDF) - https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/062226zor_g314.pdf
tavernier
(14,569 posts)In other news, SCOTUS takes up issue of modern new robes, preferring something lighter and cooler. The final vote was 6 - 3 for white robes and a stylish pointed cap which could be worn at night when traveling to cross burnings, to assure privacy from reporters and angry citizens.
They need to be disrobed. They are a disgrace. They have taken it upon themselves not to interpret the Constitution and it's Amendments but to reinterpret and destroy them. The ruling to give Trump total immunity has no basis in the Constitution. Quite the contrary. The job of the President according to the Article II section 3:
The Take Care Clause is found in Article II, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution and requires the President to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed". It serves as the constitutional foundation for the President's enforcement power, ensuring that all federal statutes are properly administered and obeyed.
They have totally abandoned their responsibility to their oath.
Lonestarblue
(13,628 posts)For example, if someone lost both hands in an accident or war, could that person no longer have someone drive them to the polls or operate the voting machine? Without hands or with medical conditions that prevent you from filling out a mail ballot clearly, you no longer get to vote? The SC is discriminating against people with disabilities in those states.
wolfie001
(8,172 posts)Just like America before 1965. Sick nasty mf'ers.
wolfie001
(8,172 posts)Not a shock. Expected.
bluestarone
(22,531 posts)Our problems are just beginning i fear!