Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(172,239 posts)
Tue May 19, 2026, 10:13 AM 8 hrs ago

Ketanji Brown Jackson says Supreme Court risks being seen as political after voting rights decision

Source: AP

Updated 10:46 PM EDT, May 18, 2026


WASHINGTON (AP) — Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said Monday that the Supreme Court risks being seen as political in the wake of a major voting rights decision.

She spoke after writing a solo dissent from the court’s decision allowing Louisiana to move quickly to use new maps after the court’s conservative majority struck down a majority-Black district and weakened the Voting Rights Act.

“Public confidence is really all the judiciary has,” she said at a talk before the American Law Institute in Washington, D.C. “Everyone believes the court system is outside the political sphere. I think that means it’s incumbent on us to do things, to act in ways, that shore up public confidence,” she said.

Polling has shown public trust in the Supreme Court at historic lows in recent years, and Chief Justice John Roberts has separately bemoaned a perception that the justices are “political actors,” calling it a misunderstanding.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-voting-rights-justice-jackson-d9971fd19f7a63c841e7890b89e104f6

30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ketanji Brown Jackson says Supreme Court risks being seen as political after voting rights decision (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 8 hrs ago OP
RISKS??? Lokee11 8 hrs ago #1
Did she really use the word "risks?" Festivito 5 hrs ago #21
Exactly my post! BidenRocks 5 hrs ago #22
In her defense... BaronChocula 5 hrs ago #23
Understatement of the year... sop 8 hrs ago #2
Thats rather mild considering how it looks to outsiders. Srkdqltr 7 hrs ago #3
No shit Ketanji Brown Jackson suegeo 7 hrs ago #4
Me too. That was a major nail in the coffin. Amaryllis 6 hrs ago #16
Political Whip-poor-will 7 hrs ago #5
It already is political. SamuelAdams 7 hrs ago #6
Ya think? Ocelot II 7 hrs ago #7
In other news: water is wet, grass is green... NT mwooldri 7 hrs ago #8
Oh really. nt doc03 7 hrs ago #9
Does she remember Roe? TBF 7 hrs ago #10
I feel so bad for Justice Jackson, she never deserved to be thrown in with THEM! FakeNoose 7 hrs ago #11
Risks being seen?????? Quanto Magnus 7 hrs ago #12
WTaF, Risks!?!?!? BradBo 7 hrs ago #13
Sorry, Ketanji. It's a foregone conclusion. Baitball Blogger 7 hrs ago #14
Risks being seen, my ass, it is political. republianmushroom 7 hrs ago #15
R I S K S ???????????????????????? Historic NY 6 hrs ago #17
No risk about it at all. ananda 6 hrs ago #18
"Risks" ? "Seen" ? C Moon 6 hrs ago #19
Sooner. Gore v Bush. nt BWdem4life 4 hrs ago #28
Exactly what I was thinking. Karma13612 3 hrs ago #29
Well, at least she seems 'concerned'. Talitha 5 hrs ago #20
Of course it's obvious; but I tend to agree w poster Baronchocula that she's being. .. electric_blue68 5 hrs ago #24
That's tippy-toeing around the issue already in everyone's face mdbl 5 hrs ago #25
Risks??? That's so 1999 awesomerwb1 4 hrs ago #26
Hitler risked looking like a bad guy. Klarkashton 4 hrs ago #27
That ship has sailed, Justice Brown Jackson choie 13 min ago #30

Festivito

(13,916 posts)
21. Did she really use the word "risks?"
Tue May 19, 2026, 12:39 PM
5 hrs ago

I know it's in the article but I almost can't believe that she actually said it.

BaronChocula

(4,743 posts)
23. In her defense...
Tue May 19, 2026, 01:09 PM
5 hrs ago

Though it sounds like she's mitigating to the point of neutrality, she's crossing a line that doesn't get crossed at the SC. As a matter of their own tradition, they don't say things about each other that are obvious to the rest of us. They may have it out in wordy decisions, but they don't typically call each other out publicly. She opened a can of worms in what seems like a plainly obvious statement.

FakeNoose

(42,406 posts)
11. I feel so bad for Justice Jackson, she never deserved to be thrown in with THEM!
Tue May 19, 2026, 11:07 AM
7 hrs ago

Our U.S. Constitution used to be the model for all countries to follow if they wanted true Democracy.
Chump and the Project 2025 group have besmirched and destroyed all of it, including our SCOTUS.

C Moon

(13,737 posts)
19. "Risks" ? "Seen" ?
Tue May 19, 2026, 12:24 PM
6 hrs ago

The rest of us have seen this for a more than a decade. If no sooner, at least with the screw up of President Obama’s swearing in.

electric_blue68

(27,307 posts)
24. Of course it's obvious; but I tend to agree w poster Baronchocula that she's being. ..
Tue May 19, 2026, 01:20 PM
5 hrs ago

mild mannered bc in public they rarely speak out against each other - while voicing their opinions on matters in their dissent.

I'm guessing she might be fuming, and hottified inside!

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ketanji Brown Jackson say...